Watching the Chris Wallace interview , I was struck with the fact that Clinton was slurring his words , he seemed confused ; over-reacted to a simple question and became confrontational ..I wonder if he is about to have a stroke or a heart attack ? And frankly , I wonder why his personal physician does not notice these symptoms .
2006-09-24 11:43:30 · 21 answers · asked by missmayzie 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
He should be confrontational.. what he didn't do has created a real hardship on the world. I do think it was more defensive than confrontational. What he didn't do was follow up on the plan (the same one Bush acted on) that was concocted way back in '98. He had Kerry, Kennedy and a few others behind him, at that time.. now they have reversed themselves only, because Bush did what they didn't do. He did have the opportunity to get Osama, but refused. Not once but 3 times. That does not include the time he had another opportunity in Afghanistan. So, we have a total of 4 missed opportunities in 8 years.. but Bush was expected to do it in 8 months?????? Talk about sleight of hand or tongue.
2006-09-24 12:49:59 · answer #1 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He is absolutely fine! Confused? I think not! He should have been confrontational years ago. His indiscretion while in the White House, although morally reprehensible, never put the US or its citizens in any sort of jeopardy. What his successor has done in by far more egregious. Clinton should never have been impeached. His successor deserves impeachment on many actions. Clinton never needs to concede to anyone in office as being a lesser man or a lesser president. He is a bigger man than all of the White House and its staff. I'd vote for him all over again and be proud to have him in the White House again. The shape our country is in today, it's a pity he isn't eligible. And, No, I don't think Hillary is the answer. That's another debate for another question.
2006-09-24 12:09:25 · answer #2 · answered by Teacher 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I didn't see the interview but it wouldn't surprise me if his health still isn't well. I mean, he had that heart surgery a couple of years back and I don't think anyone can ever fully recover from something like that. As for him over-reacting and being confrontational, I guess if he was having a bad day it would translate to that on camera.
2006-09-24 15:47:35 · answer #3 · answered by patgd25 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Over-reacted? No! I don't think so. Wallace falsely accused Clinton of screwing up the operation to kill Bin Laden and implied that he didn't do enough. Clinton, quite rightly, got angry and gave Wallace a dose of reality. I would get angry too. Why should he be blamed for everything? Wallace was shockingly biased and prejudiced as an interviewer. Wallace got what he deserved.
2006-09-24 11:47:15 · answer #4 · answered by Cardinal Richelieu 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
everyone has a day when they get flustered, especially when they're going through something stressful like a televised interview thats going to be somewhat one-sided against you. ever notice that fox news has trademarked "fair and balanced" ? its the same as if i were to trademark "best tasting sandwich ever" and then sell you 2 pieces of bread with my old gym shoes in the middle. as long as i own the words of the phrase, i dont need to actually prove that its true.
and theres lots of ppl out there that slur their speech, mumble, get confused, and overreact, just look at the man in the oval office. clinton has done this very few times, bush does it somewhat frequently, he's not a very good public speaker.
i suspect the same thing would happen if bush was on a news program that leans to the left, its easy to be goaded into something like that if you're not at the very peak of your game at that exact moment.
2006-09-24 11:54:57 · answer #5 · answered by hellion210 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
You attacked Bill Clinton before in another question you asked..
If you think your such an expert why aren't you his physician.
He has the right to be confrontational, i am sure the question wasn't innocent.
I am sure you over react, Bill Clinton can too if he pleases.
2006-09-24 11:46:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
considering the only sex he has had in the past six years been with Hillery he is lucky he not in the fetal position lying on the floor
2006-09-24 12:49:24 · answer #7 · answered by skihill 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His personal physicain probably has noticed. But the man does have a right to privacy. If he had such and such a disease/infection/problem... is it necessary to tell the whole world?
2006-09-24 11:51:24 · answer #8 · answered by helpme1 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He seemed ok at the Ryder Cup today...
2006-09-24 11:46:46 · answer #9 · answered by sarch_uk 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably AIDS. We can only hope.
Amazing how the idiot couldn't do ANYTHING constructive until after he got out of office.
2006-09-24 11:53:29 · answer #10 · answered by usaf.primebeef 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋