English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

but someone you dont know would die, would you do it?

2006-09-24 11:38:26 · 19 answers · asked by Thoughts Like Mine 3 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

19 answers

No I won't press that button. For me it is similar to kill someone I know. Secondly who knows someone the other day who doesn't know me gets that box & kill me!

2006-09-24 21:48:19 · answer #1 · answered by Annie 2 · 0 1

For only one hundred million dollars, probably not, but if it was maybe one billion or even ine hundred billion dollars, then yes. One hundred million dollars would not be enough to make a fair enough impact for everyone. It means that only a selected few will be lucky to actually be impacted by the charitable use of one hundred million dollars. And for the people who are not so luckily graced, it would be unfair and just plain sad.

2006-09-24 11:44:40 · answer #2 · answered by bloop87 4 · 0 0

No.

You never know what pushing a button may cause you... maybe I will know that person 5 years later after I reject the process of gaining One Hundred Million Dollars. That stranger could be the key to your success or to your doom but I would never push such button. I'd earn it.

Stay Safe. - Maryam

2006-09-24 12:00:48 · answer #3 · answered by piercing integrity 4 · 0 0

No because then I would get the million if I pushed the button and then it would be like what goes around comes around and the same thing may come back on me by someone else pushing a button w/the same question then I may die someone not knowing me, LOL Like the movie "THE RING (one & two). The person that looked at the tape would die if they did not get someone to look at the tape. LOL I would just stay poor in wealth but rich in spirit. THANKS but no thanks. LOL

2006-09-24 11:52:01 · answer #4 · answered by sweettoni37 4 · 0 0

a million. 0 2. never attempting 3. being scared that life would be ended earlier we are waiting. 4. sure. 5. that there are distinctive races. 6. being a comedian. 7. unfortunatly, ettling for what i'm doing. 8. nicely I already take adequate hazards to delight in life, so no longer something. Oh wait... eat greater junk nutrition. 9. approximately 0.5. 10. doing the final issues. 11. tell them to STFU and GTFO. 12. We decide issues by using our attitude. 13. sure. In a heartbeat. 14. all the time... paintings! 15. be who i replaced into whilst i replaced into born. Be myself. sixteen.all of us's perspectives are distinctive. 17. Say my thoughts all the time. i do no longer choose to break all of us. 18. no longer on the 2nd... 19. Germany. i could stick up for my united states of america and there is way less poverty or stupid people. 20. No. I facepalm on the persons who do. 21. demanding genius. 22. an experience seeker. 23. somewhat. i might desire to paintings on it. 24. whilst a reliable chum strikes away. They take a bite of your heart. 25. my wellness or my buddies. 26. never make new ones 27. sure. 28. No. 29. sure. never. 30. Dancing with my grandfather. He has Alzheimers late degree now. 31. whilst i'm snowmobiling or snowboarding outdoors in the wintertime. 32. once I come back on my feet. 33. incredibly much something. 34. No 35. disagreements. 36.No. all of us has distinctive perspectives. 37. No :D i do no longer paintings for the money. 38. greater paintings I delight in doing. 39. No, because of the fact on a daily basis has a distinctive activities. 40. incredibly much on a daily basis. 40-one. all of us i could. 40 two. No. Who is conscious what super achievments you ould finished in 10 years. 40 3. Being alive has incredibly much no purpose on the same time as somewhat living ability living life to the fullest. 40 4. on a daily basis. 40 5. In concern of suffering the implications. 40 six. no longer something. i do no longer care if people decide me. it is their concern. 40 seven. whilst i'm working by using myself. 40 8. My buddies. no longer likely... 40 9. sure, because of the fact i attempt to make the main out of each 2nd. 50. 0.5 and 0.5.

2016-12-12 14:20:30 · answer #5 · answered by briana 4 · 0 0

No. People are saying, "you could make a difference with the money", but how does that excuse killing someone? How can you suddenly rid the world of this person's life and creativity and love and personality and say, it's alright because: a) I didn't know them, and b) I can now use this money to help people.

2006-09-24 12:08:19 · answer #6 · answered by DT 2 · 0 0

yes,

I know it sound callous, but it is what you did witht he one hundred million which would make the difference.

If it were the other way around - and if someone would use the money for good then I would offer my life

2006-09-24 11:41:58 · answer #7 · answered by NW_iq_140 2 · 0 0

yes. how many lives could be saved with that 100 million? quite a few, i think. usually its not good to kill people to save others, but in a rare situation like this, i think it would be.

2006-09-24 12:11:19 · answer #8 · answered by student_of_life 6 · 0 0

yes, i would make sure some good came out of that money to the family of which the life was lost though

2006-09-24 11:44:24 · answer #9 · answered by pyor_ballplaya 1 · 0 0

Yes,without hesitation.

2006-09-24 11:40:40 · answer #10 · answered by Alion 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers