2006-09-24 11:16:32 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Nobody should bomb anybody, no matter what the fxck they are doing! I think certain countries should just mind their own business! God will take care of the 'judging' it is not the job of (a country)
2006-09-24 11:25:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean 'back to the stoneage'? As with most (if not all) Muslim countries the Pakistan govt. keeps it's people oppressed and controlled through an arcane and obsolete 'religion'. They always were providing such a safe-haven and we should have been bombing them all along, all of the Mid-east, until it is flat and desolate (even more so than it is now).
2006-09-24 11:22:15 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin O 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they shouldn't. Pakistan has the nuclear bomb. Would you want to start a nuclear Holocaust? The whole world would turn against the United States and the mother of all wars would start. Can the United States take the whole world? NO. That is suicide!
2006-09-24 12:42:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
expensive abc, truthfully no longer. the concept of our international society of countries is that each and each sovereign state has the final to secure practices interior its very own borders. Intimidation and threats by ability of any distant places u . s . are thoroughly unacceptable, despite the reason. the U. S. itself stood as much as the bullies of this planet in the process international war II, and then helped discovered the United international locations to make effective that no different bullies might floor. it would be an extremely superb irony if the U. S. grew to become out to be the comparable as those it so nobly fought to defeat. "Harbouring terrorists" is an extremely damaging rationalization for this way of intimidation. No government could be attentive to for particular that one and all their voters are actually not terrorists, and if some are, their life by ability of no ability constitutes an endorsement of them by ability of the government of that u . s .. and whether the government did take place to secretly abet terrorists, this remains no rationalization for threatening to bathe loss of life and destruction upon the loads of thousands of harmless voters of the rustic in question. that's the best judgment of psychopaths, and the tactics of butchers. Timothy McVeigh and his happy gang in good shape each definition of a terrorist, and as all of us be attentive to they have been additionally violently anti-Semitic... Does that then inevitably propose the U. S. government become in charge for them, or intentionally secure them? What could have been the reaction interior the U. S. if the Israeli government threatened the human beings with bombing till it "helped interior the combat against anti-Semitism"? Regards,
2016-10-17 21:55:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should they? No.
Will they? No.
Do they really give a "darn" about Al-Qaeda anyway? No.
2006-09-24 11:27:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
really how u know that i think ur from al qaeda
2006-09-24 11:21:22 · answer #6 · answered by LOST 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
why doesn't the US bomb everyone back to the stoneage, that disagrees with it
2006-09-24 11:22:51 · answer #7 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nervous breakdown
2006-09-24 11:24:28 · answer #8 · answered by Boulou 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I understand it would not be very hard, since they are close already.
2006-09-24 11:24:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋