English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

You would think that Red States would be the natural oppoition target.

2006-09-24 08:32:55 · 14 answers · asked by Skull&Bones 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Don K wrote: "'m sure that bin laden keeps track of which states are red and which ones are blue."

I was thinking John Skerry is really Ben Laden.

I see no reason why he would not be on a forum like this sowing division and laughing all the time.

2006-09-24 08:44:27 · update #1

Or maybe he was just getting revenge for the US destroying the two skyscrapers in Lebanon. You know like he said. Tit for tat bombing

2006-09-24 08:48:18 · update #2

14 answers

Bin Laden didn't attack any states.
The attack on 9/11 was by the US Government.
It was definitely an inside job.
I know the truth is hard to swallow, but Many Americans have already become aware.
The latest polls show:
42% of Americans believe that their government was complict in 9/11.
75% of firemen and policemen in New York belive it was an inside job
52% of the relatives of the deceased believe it was an inside job.
Isn't it time you examined the facts?

2006-09-25 19:30:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

New York City has the 2nd largest population of Jews in the world (almost as many as Israel) and Washington DC happens to have the most powerful "Red Staters" in the country living there temporarily.

2006-09-24 08:43:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That should win the stupid question of the year award. I'm sure that bin laden keeps track of which states are red and which ones are blue. Why do you try to find something in nothing? Just like to hear your self rattle?

2006-09-24 08:37:46 · answer #3 · answered by Don K 5 · 0 1

are you trying to give the political 9/11 religious cause. The media has already done this. They not once told the people that it was not religious but political. They are afraid of bringing Israel's name so they have to say it is religious.

2006-09-24 08:42:12 · answer #4 · answered by observer 4 · 0 0

He doesn't care about conservative vesrsus liberal, we're all Americans and westerners which is what I keep telling liberals. "Don't try to sympethize with or compromise with these extremists, they don't care about anybody, not even muslims."

So long as you're not their kinda muslim, you're an infidel not worthy of life at all.

2006-09-24 08:36:31 · answer #5 · answered by Masterwooten 2 · 0 0

He's too clever. He wanted to get Bush re-elected. And he succeeded.

Anyway, NYC is neutral territory. It's got all the super-rich Repubs.

2006-09-24 08:35:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He knows that the blue areas are defenseless and run by cowards.
Does a bully kick sand at the weakest (libs) or the strongest (cons) man on the beach?
I rest my case...

2006-09-24 09:00:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Maybe he doesn't really want a holy war after all. Or maybe he just wanted to kill as many Jews as possible.

2006-09-24 08:43:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He is not a Prince but rather a loyal subject.you can ask his handler Ambassador Khalilzad .

2006-09-24 08:39:47 · answer #9 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0 0

Because the WTC was not in the middle of some redneck town.

2006-09-24 08:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers