To all homosexuals: I don't agree with ur sexualty but I LOVE YA mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmwaaaaaaaah
2006-09-24 06:29:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Freud once speculated that homophobic people were afraid of their own homosexual tendencies and so they would enter a state of denial. The business of harassing gays is reflective of defence mechanisms and redistribution of blame. I think there is some truth in this. A few years ago, on SIxty Minutes, they did a study and talked to a number of psychiatrists and found some basis in this claim.
Anyway, I think because gays do not have active roles in government policy, the community or the media, they do not get to show who they really are. I have no problem with same-sex marriage; I just don't think people will be knocking down the doors of churches and city halls to get married.
Some people try to connect homosexuality to abuse, criminal activity, the spread of HIV and hepatitis, drug use and other negative notions that are based on prejudice and misunderstanding.
2006-09-24 13:31:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ok you had me right up till you started talking about how little your cock was.
No one should spew hate and expect us to respect thier message.
I am g0y I am Christian and I am going to heaven.
I also do not judge gays or lesbians and I dont judge pagans everyone is free to accept what ever truth they see fit.
Just because someone doesn't see things the same way I do doesn't make me automatically want them to see it my way.
We all need to live and let live.
2006-09-24 13:48:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♂ Randy W. ♂ 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Gays seem to be at the bottom of the pecking order: no matter how far down the pecking order another group is, its members still feel superior to and have no problem picking on gays.
What causes such deep and unreasonable hatred?
Prior to the late 1800s, the concept of homosexuality did not exist. The idea that one would exclusively feel romantically and sexually drawn to a member of the same sex was not considered. Yes, there was certainly homosexual activity, but this had always existed. The Hebrews, for example, did not have a word for homosexuality. When they wanted to describe the forbidden activity, they had to say, "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable" (Leviticus 18:22). Similarly, the Greeks had no word for homosexual. Paul had to explain: "Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another" (Romans 1:26–27). There was no word, then, for a man who went to bed only with men or a woman who went to bed only with women.
Can it matter where or in whom you put it?
MARK ANTONY……………..81–30 B.C.
To even ask the question would be as unusual as asking today, "Are you a hot dog eater or a hamburger eater?" The idea that one preference would exclude the other made no sense. Even if one has not eaten a hot dog in twenty years, one would never think of defining oneself as a hamburgerist. Likewise, a person who had never had a hamburger in his or her life but adored hot dogs, would not be labeled "a hotdogger."
In societies of ancient Greece and Rome, sexual activity with either gender was perfectly acceptable. To exclusively go to bed with one sex or the other, in fact, was considered a bit odd—just as eating only raw vegetables might be considered a bit unusual today. In the ancient world, the distinction was: "Were you the dominant or the passive partner in the sex act?" In relationships between men, the dominant partner was praised, and the passive partner was condemned. Why? Because to play the passive partner meant a man voluntarily played the part of a woman.
It's the ancient anti-woman prejudice that permeates what we call Western Civilizations. Why would a man want to play the part of a woman? To do so was considered unnatural, self-deprecating, and perverse. If slaves or captives did it with their owners, that was acceptable: they had to. But for a man who had a choice to take the passive role in sex was considered degrading.
And therein lies the seed of the prejudice. It wasn't that homosexual activity was wrong; it was a man playing the woman's role in homosexual activity that was considered perverted.
Alexander the Great—whose masculinity was never in doubt—had as a primary sexual partner a castrated Persian boy. Alexander also had a wife. No one questioned the arrangement. Alexander played the dominant role in both relationships. He was a "man." Both Alexander's wife and the Persian boy were treated with the respect due the ruler's favorites, but with little admiration.
The second reason homosexuality is so feared and despised is that homosexuality is too close to home. It's fairly easy for, say, white people to become tolerant of black people because white people are not black. White people seldom think, "I think I'll have black skin for the next two hours." White people and black people are so fundamentally different—in terms of skin color—that white people almost never think, "I wonder if I'm really black?"
This sense of security is not found with homosexuality. On a purely biological level, the human animal responds sexually to lubricated friction. It doesn't much matter whether this lubricated friction is being applied by a man, a woman, a machine, or a well-trained dog; human sexual response on the biological level is automatic.
It is also true that human beings can feel affection—even love—for members of their own sex. Affection is not a tidy emotion. It tends to lap into mental, emotional, physical, sensual, and even sexual expression.
When one first realizes that he or she is actually capable of some kind of sexual and/or emotional response with a member of the same sex, panic ensues. Before children are even aware of their sexuality, they know that homosexuality is bad. Very bad. Among boys eight years or older, the most pejorative name they can call each other is "******!" Later, when they become aware of their sexuality and find—even for a moment—that it flashes in the direction of the same sex, there's trouble in River City.
At this point, one has the choice to (a) confront one of the greatest and most pervasive taboos in our culture or (b) deny the inner reaction vehemently by supporting the taboo all the more enthusiastically. Invariably, (b) is the choice. It's an old psychological truism: the more you want to taste of the forbidden fruit, the more you condemn it. Shakespeare realized this, and assumed his audience understood the concept so well that he made it a joke: "The lady doth protest too much, methinks." (Hamlet, Act III, Scene 2, Line 242.) That line has been met by the laughter of recognition for almost four hundred years.
By soundly condemning homosexuality outwardly, one avoids facing even the possibility that one might—just maybe—feel love for or be capable of responding sexually to a member of one's own sex
2006-09-24 19:59:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bearable 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think it's 1 or a combination of everything you have stated, along with fear and ignorance. I think some of these sad, miserable people actually get off/pump up their lame egos by passing judgment upon others. It might make them feel better about their despicable selves, but to others, it only makes them look more like hateful, nasty bigots that they are.
2006-09-24 13:51:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by redcatt63 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
everything is bcuz of ppl ignorance why what i will care what u have under pants or skirt or what u do with it it is ur private life and ur bussiness whatever u do is behind close door and not distracting anybody or doing any harms god loves evrybody he created gay lesbian straight or something else from same mud i don't see no diffrence in anything we all brothers and sisters of most hi sun shines on everybody the same it's not choosing good or bad and we breathe same air what else we need to shut up and don't judge anybody bcuz we judge ourselves god bless all lesbians transgenders cross -dressers gays and so on WITH LOVE AND HAPPY LANDING on your journey of life LIFE IS UR BEST TEACHER
2006-09-24 13:38:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by george p 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why do you think these people are gays or lesbo's? If they were why would they pretend hate? God does love these people but He does not and never will accept their choice to be gay or lesbo. They will have to choose God or their lifestyle. As for your other problem if you are that intense in your desire to have sex you need a lot more to do in life.
2006-09-24 13:33:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brianne 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
people are people no matter what there prefrence in sex is..some people dont understand why there like that so instead of trying to understand they turn toward hate and ridicule.....its a shame cuz gays and lesibians and bisexual are people just like you and me..hopefully some day they will learn that...one more thing homesexualty is in the genes...
2006-09-24 13:33:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by little_outlaw_angel 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Some parts of all of the above...but mostly because they can---they can talk about homosexuality and retain their anonymity...they're confused...maybe they'll learn.
But not until they stop hating themselves so much.
2006-09-24 15:18:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I was going to answer but you had to go and get childish. The cocks bit is just immature.
2006-09-24 13:28:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Mostly do to Christian preachers and Evangelists spewing hate.
2006-09-24 13:39:24
·
answer #11
·
answered by tammidee10 6
·
1⤊
1⤋