There were eggs long before chickens
2006-09-24 05:35:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
1⤋
Here's my thought. The egg had to come first. No chicken was born live, i.e. popped out of mom as a living breathing walking around sort of creature. Chickens always come from eggs. Somewhere along the evolutionary path an animal that wasn't quite a chicken laid an egg with a chicken in it, and the similarities were such that that chicken was capable of reproducing with the species from which it was derived. That's my opinion and I'm sticking with it.
2006-09-24 12:43:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ice 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ok, so the prehistoric bird that laid the chicken egg was so inferior to every other animal that it evolved itself into a CHICKEN? Come on people, surely any animal with the ability to morph into a new species would chose something better than a CHICKEN. I mean, why doesn't the chicken have venom or something(anything at all) to protect itself against predators? These creatures are completely defenseless. Seriously, these animals have a clear purpose and that is FOOD. That's all they were intended to be, all they ever were and all they ever will be.
2006-09-27 17:22:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a paradox that can't be answered. If the egg came first, where did that egg come from if not a chicken? If the chicken came first, where did it come from if not an egg?
There is no answer that can't be logically refuted.
Other than that I can't answer this because I wasn't there.
2006-09-24 13:48:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Willow S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
an animal/brid very like a chicken back in the day of the dinosaurs layed ann egg and due to evolution a chicken was formed so in other words the egg came first or so i believe
2006-09-24 12:44:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Thomas B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the chicken came with the egg already inside her.
2006-09-27 13:15:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by gin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Egg first.
Chickens are hatched from eggs.
Thus egg had to present for the chicken to evolve (regardless if it was a mutation-evolution-or result of some form of cross breeding bwt birds and Fowls)
2006-09-24 12:42:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by cork 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Logically two different species would have to mate to produce an egg that would then hatch into a chicken. Hope that helps!
2006-09-24 12:42:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by psychoticgenius 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the chicken came first. GOD put man on the earth then they mated,hence children. the same applies to chickens without chickens.there would be no eggs to fertilise.
2006-09-24 13:06:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by letitbe 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
chicken and egg went into a motel room, few minutes later, the chicken came out and lit a cigarette.
now we know which came first........
2006-09-24 12:42:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by wzrdsndrgns 3
·
1⤊
0⤋