English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

it is better to fight our enemys there then here;

the reasons for the US Invasion of Iraq are as follows

1. violating 23 UN resolutions
2. providing training Manuel's to Al Qaida
3. financial support of Al Qaida
4. providing medical support to Al Qaida
5. having established support to Al Qaida
6. providing a place for Al Qaida to establish a place to network from
7. funding Al Qaida's attack on the USS Cole
8. Bin Laden was attempting to build a relationship with saddam based on hate for the USA and to move his base to Iraq becasue of tensions with the Taliban
9. saddam possesed NBC weapons which had used 10 times since 1983 and 3 times since the first Gulf War.
10. Saddam supported hizbollah

finally , it was also because of the support the president recieved when he said we would hunt down and destroy the terrorists and those that support them.

Source(s) Bankrupt by David Limbough
911 comission
congressional voting records in support of the invasion

2006-09-24 05:04:00 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

they were found and those that were not were moved to Syria by russian special forces

2006-09-24 05:08:02 · update #1

11 answers

I copied your question and may use it to support America from time to time against Nazislamic Fascist and Liberals oh sorry same thing
I knew already just too lazy to list
thanks

2006-09-24 05:09:25 · answer #1 · answered by buzzy360comecme 3 · 1 4

You missed a couple.

11. The U.S. wants to establish permanent bases in the Middle East and Turkey has been repeatedly belligerent.

12. The U.S. wants a U.S. buffer between Iran and Israel.

13. Everything above answer number 11 is nonsense.

Saddam criticized Al Queda, refused to sanction any of their activities. Saddam's crap was sanctioned by the Reagan administration when they armed him and taught him how to fight against a more powerful military when Iran and Iraq were at war. (techniques, by the way, that his supporters are using against the US military). The Reagan adminstration turned a blind eye to the crap that Iraq did because they wanted to hurt Iran. When the US went in they found no WMD's and no evidence of an attempt to possess them. You know, if King George wanted to oust Saddam, he should have flown over there himself.

2006-09-24 05:13:44 · answer #2 · answered by Ice 6 · 2 0

Everything you said is wrong except for the violating UN resolutions part. And there we no ties between Saddam and Bin Laden. Saddam would not accept him into his country.
BTW, your sources are biased...they told the public what the President wanted the public to think.

2006-09-24 05:07:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you dont give a damn about the UN, you've supported hizbollah and hussein and the taliban and all sorts of mad terrorists through the years, you've probably created them by funding them initially or by bombing their countres, and you've still failed to win your war. Either you are liars or failures, but most of the rest of the world thinks both.

this is really dangerous nonsense and to keep plugging these lies away at anyone outside the US just makes you more ridiculous by the second, do you know that?..

you're in it to keep israel safe, as usual, your little pet rottweiler in the region happy, for terrority and resources. how can you count a shocked, bombed-out country as your 'enemy'

2006-09-24 05:16:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

okay, great so we got Saddam (one bad guy) where is Osama? How come we can't find him? That's right, we aren't looking. They could find the Al-Qeida leader but not Osama, who's family happened to be in good standing with Bush's before 09/11, crazy.

2006-09-24 05:10:08 · answer #5 · answered by Juicy Fruit 4 · 2 0

Won't work, S H I R A Z. Not even if you showed proof of each item. Most people would rather shout their opinions than be proved wrong in their thinking.

2006-09-24 05:20:02 · answer #6 · answered by kyme 2 · 0 0

number 1 and thats about it or do you believe every thing bush tells you????btw where was the insurgency when saddam was in power ??????

2006-09-24 05:11:11 · answer #7 · answered by ? 7 · 1 0

Did you find all those WMD's yet??

Bush would never lie! HeHe

AND Iraq did NOT financially support Al Queda either.

2006-09-24 05:06:18 · answer #8 · answered by Villain 6 · 1 3

Liberals, whats your favorite quote from this site? http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

2006-09-24 05:10:17 · answer #9 · answered by Ah Ha 4 · 1 0

nicely stated, Iraq was a threat and the democrats saw it at the time, now their flip flopping .... strange aint it....

2006-09-24 05:15:42 · answer #10 · answered by shut up dummy 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers