Considering the alternatives - would it be better if Tony Blair had stayed on longer ?
2006-09-24 04:56:18 · 9 answers · asked by LongJohns 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
it would be better if he had never got power in the first place.
2006-09-24 04:57:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that blair and his 'spin' and lies should never have come in the first place. He has destroyed this country
2006-09-24 05:03:56 · answer #2 · answered by kbw 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would have been less humiliating for him if he had kept it to himself, but as for the rest of the country, anything that raises moral like that has to be a good thing. Gives them something to look forward to.
2006-09-24 05:05:35 · answer #3 · answered by sixgun 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope the sooner he goes the better i know he'll only be replaced by some other idiot but hey enoughs enough his time is up i'll shed no tears when he goes
2006-09-24 05:04:52 · answer #4 · answered by kj 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
im absolutely fed up to the back teeth with all the newspapers/tv going on about "when will he be going/name the day"etc etc surely there must be other things to report about.....
2006-09-24 05:01:07 · answer #5 · answered by dee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i really don't mind..i never liked blair anyway
2006-09-24 04:57:52 · answer #6 · answered by bad_mouton 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-09-24 04:57:25 · answer #7 · answered by rav 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Labour will regret it actually.
But all as bad as one another...
2006-09-24 04:59:03 · answer #8 · answered by The Mole 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES
2006-09-24 05:04:49 · answer #9 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋