English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I read the news today, Oh Boy!
A reprot reflecting the views of 16 US intelligent agencies came out.
The classified National Intelligence Estimate attaches a more direct role to the Iraq war in fuelling radicalism than either recent White House documents or the House Intelligence Committee report released last week, say officials who have read the final document.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/09/24/iraq/main2036338.shtml
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/terrorism-worse-since-iraq-war-us-spies-say/2006/09/24/1159036415717.html
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060924/ts_afp/usattackiraqintelligence_060924053534
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?ref=world

2006-09-24 04:49:04 · 27 answers · asked by wlday2002 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

The conclusion is that the world is less safe thanks
to the Bush Admin.!

2006-09-24 04:50:00 · update #1

Bush supporters, It's time to wake up!

2006-09-24 05:04:22 · update #2

Hey Tom- I know you are just a kid.
This is real! There are not a lot of liberal deadheads twirling around over at CIA. Jon Stewart didn't write this report. You need to wake up! I don't care what you think of me.
The next terrorist attack is insured by this administration
because of their behavior!

2006-09-24 05:12:40 · update #3

27 answers

I figured this out over two years ago.

2006-09-24 04:50:56 · answer #1 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 3 5

I have never supported him.

Bush's problems.

One of the biggest problems facing the world today is the threat of a nuclear holocaust.
The most powerful nuclear weapons in the world are in the hands of the President of the United States.
It is therefore of absolute prime importance for the security of our survival that this person is of absolutely sound mind.
It has been stated by the author of 'Bush in the Couch' that George Bush is not of sound mind.
He has built in his own mind an imaginery world, and now he actually believes what he says, even though time and again it has been proven that his beliefs are very far from reality.
The people outside America can do very little about this situation, apart from waging war. A couple of people, like Ahmadinejad and Chavez have had the courage to speak up in front of the world, and that is the best we could have hoped for.
It is up to the American people to find some backbone, and demonstrate that they are not just weak-willed-lilly-livered cowards. They must rise up in unison and demand that the danger in the White House be removed immediately.
Until they do this, the world is in the utmost danger.
So many are afraid to accept that there is anything wrong, and continue to live in denial, hiding behind there own imaginery screens and avoiding examining the facts.

2006-09-26 17:46:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I just Adore this response: "
All your sources have Liberal bias and will of course be anti Bush. However there has not been a terrorist attack on US soil since 911 under Bush." from one of your answers below. So typical for those who choose not to admit their dear president is capable of any wrongdoing. The rest of the world thinks he is Only capable of this. We are the only country divided on the issue of George W Bush. His ratings have skyrocket to between 37% and 43% depending on the poll, so he must be wonderful. By contrast, President Clinton’s ratings never got below 57%, in spite of "Monica Gate" and the like.

And my dear Bush fan, there was no terrorist attack in the U.S. for eight years before 9/11. Perhaps you recall the First Al Quada attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. That one was with a truck bomb, and probably would have caused more casualties than the second attack if successful. This explosion would have collapsed the towers from the ground up, leaving no chance for survival. Al Quada was still in a learning phase and didn't quite park the truck next to the proper support beam. Someone was illegally parked there so they had to choose another spot. So, my dear, just because it has been 5 years since the last terrorist attack do not be fooled into thinking this President has made us safer. Al Quada is nothing if not patient. Another attack will come; it may be in a year, maybe ten. In case you were wondering I am responding the Liberal lover down below not the author of this question, although my answer will serve both.

I would not say that Bush has lost his so-called "War on Terror" - a war without boundaries, a war without end. But I would say he has emboldened and strengthened our enemies and made Al Quada a much stronger organization than it was five years ago. He has also put a huge banner out for recruitment in Al Quada by accommodating the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women and children. These images are shown every day not just in the "liberal media" but also in every Arab country around the world. They see what we see, bodies by the score being found dumped in the streets, after being burned, stabbed, eyes gouged out and any number of atrocities. You may say "but it's the terrorists who are doing this, not us" That is partly true, some of it Al Quada, other is sectarian violence brought about by a sudden vacuum in power with no clear plan to stabilize the country!

They see dead babies, and they think of George W Bush. Who can blame them really? But I guess that is just liberal and biased thought. But wait, are the Muslims liberals? I don't think so.

I knew this war would increase the threat of terrorism before the U.S. invasion to remove the "weapons of mass destruction” I think we should have worried about the smaller weapons al little more, like the ones that massacre our soldiers and Iraqi civilians. How can you launch a war, even if you think it a just cause, with NO PLAN to win the peace? The Iraqis saw us as liberators for a week, while the party was on Saddams statue fell. After that we were Occupiers, much as the Germans occupied France in WW2. I feel sorry for you people who genuinely believe that your president is in any way winning the "War on Terror". I pray to God our many hundreds of thousands of NEW enemies do not prove you otherwise. What do you get when you kill a terrorist in Iraq? How about a hundred more just like him.

2006-09-25 05:06:36 · answer #3 · answered by Samuel Crow 3 · 1 0

All your sources have Liberal bias and will of course be anti Bush. However there has not been a terrorist attack on US soil since 911 under Bush. there have also been many foiled attacks but CNN CBS and the like wont report that! Bin Laden has been render almost powerless and in hiding (possibly dead) Saddam and his rapist sons are dead or in jail. The Iraqi people have a government chosen by the people. The Taliban has been removed from power. The list goes on and we lost the war on terror!? We have not won the war but we sure have the upper hand! Under Clinton we had several attack on Americans both here and abroad. No your wrong and I suggest you get your lips off Dan Rather and CBS's (remember his false reporting skills that got him fired) **** and read ALL sources for news not just ones that support your distorted views

2006-09-24 04:58:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 2 1

President Bush has tried hard and he has maintained a refusal to compromise on the Iraq war which has gained him some support from hard line hawks. However, standing back from the war and looking at it objectively, under Bush’s leadership as Commander-in-Chief, virtually no results have been positive. Iraq is still out of America’s control in many key areas. After five years we are still struggling to keep Bagdad secure. $500,000,000.00 has been spent so far, enough to pay off government debt bills and/or provide significant social programs or tax relief. In summary, G W Bush is a failure. The Republican Party should be voted out of office in November.

2006-09-26 07:46:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i do no longer trust we are dropping the conflict on terror. a million)because we haven't stuck Bin weighted down does no longer advise we received't capture him. i imagine he's hiding in Pakistan and we desire to crack down on them letting him conceal there. 2)Al Qeada is back to 911 power even with the indisputable fact that it truly is administration has been mangled. 3)i do not ideas giving up particular freedoms to save our united states secure from terrorists. i do not imagine regulation abiding electorate are affected in any respect by making use of what you describe as Gestapo concepts. 4)we've argued among ourselves for over 2 hundred years. what's new? 5)an analogous international places that did not help us after 911 fairly a lot nonetheless do not and by making use of and tremendous the international places who did help us then nonetheless do. I blame it on bill Clinton for no longer doing some thing about throughout his 8 years in place of work. we are figuring out to purchase his lip provider and shortage of action now.

2016-11-23 19:04:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You concluded. Conclusions are anything you care to make them. One group will conclude one thing, others will come up with a different conclusion.
I conclude that we've had no bombings in America since we took the fight over to the bombers home territory. I also conclude that we would have had many more bombings, has we done nothing.
My final conclusion is that all those who are bashing everything the country does, is doing exactly what the terrorists want them to do. I hope that you conclude that you're more for the terrorists than for the US.

2006-09-24 05:08:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

What makes you think we lost? We are still fighting the war on terror. Have there been any more 9/11's? Despite their best efforts, we have been safe all this time. Do you think this is because the terrorists havent tried?

These people are out to kill us and anyone who is not a part of their twisted version on Islam. To them the rest of the world is "The Great Satan". They want the world for themselves and will not stop until it is or they are all dead.

2006-09-24 05:02:16 · answer #8 · answered by groomingdiva_pgh 5 · 0 2

The "stirring up the hornet's nest" theory. Perhaps. How does it occur to you that we will be safer if the US leaves Iraq?

If we leave, every radical islam terrorist will take a pot-shot at the US.

The world is at least 20% muslim. These "peace-loving" muslims aren't holding the terrorists accountable, either. Have you noticed?

Spain is under the control of radical muslim. France will probably be next.

2006-09-24 04:58:48 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 1 2

Yup, I've already heard this story. Even the Republican CIA finally admits it. Good news, because now people who didn't figure it out 3 years ago like i did, can finally understand how Iraq and Afghanistan are turning into terrorist breeding grounds.

2006-09-24 05:00:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Do you know what else is disturbing, proud_2ba_american? People like you. Will you stop being such an idiot by supporting the president unconditionally? Would you support Hitler if you were German during WW II? Try forming some real opinions on issues and not bowing down to the leader.

2006-09-24 04:59:41 · answer #11 · answered by teh_n00b 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers