is this just another hipocritical postion?
2006-09-24 04:34:35 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yup... you nailed it... same reason that wind power is good anywhere except in Kennedy's back yard...
2006-09-24 05:10:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Just like the answer I gave in a simular question,the liberals postion has always been that america is the evil one and if we hug and kissy and understand our enemy,they wont hurt us.Lay down the weapons and sing kumbyeya and the world will be a better place.They are still at home having tea and cupcakes with their imaginary friend and need to grow up and realize people want to kill us bottom line.But they would rather love the enemy and continue to denegrate our governement and our military and our ability to defend ourselves.They are still living in the 1960 rebellion against the goverment and the pantywaisted cowards will be the ones crying when another country takes us over due to their idiocy.
2006-09-24 04:44:44 · answer #2 · answered by halfbright 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
the game has replace we are no longer handling those who're afraid to die. the in worry-free words reason the MAD coverage paintings is because the Russains did not opt to die both. huge difference with Vietnam and Korea. Vietnam & Korea did not opt to wipe yet another us of a off the map. Iran is furnish guns that killing our troops now. So what ought to we do wait until eventually they offer a nuke to a set and NYC glows blue earlier we do something? Or ought to we enable Israel be wipe off the map to assuage them? the following is something your evaluate ought to anybody be enable to carry any variety of gun they prefer interior the streets? If no longer why no longer because police officials have guns? imagine about it.
2016-10-16 02:04:13 · answer #3 · answered by sicilia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, Liberals are pro-peace. We don't like the idea of nuclear (not "nukuler") energy being used for anything besides lighting homes. It's the Conservatives that want to exterminate anything that isn't pro-Bush.
2006-09-24 05:55:13 · answer #4 · answered by The Man of Steel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're confusing liberal with enviromentalist. Not all liberals are environmentalists. I'm all for nuclear power and the environment. I think a lot of people are for nuclear power - they just don't want it in their back yard. That's where the problem lies. It's gonna be in someones back yard.
2006-09-24 04:39:01 · answer #5 · answered by Gene Rocks! 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Get your head out of your *** and stop spreading lies about liberals. This doesn't even deserve a mature response. A petty insult that is not true does not deserve a mature response at all.
2006-09-24 05:12:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear weapons are a form of defense, a deterrent, not an offensive weapon. Why would anybody support wiping out people in masses? You would have to be a sick son a b*tch. This would be a greater country, in my eyes, if we had to deal with others equally and be forced to accept other lifestyles and forms of government. Iran's enemies have nukes, why can they not have the ability to defend themselves?
2006-09-24 04:43:15 · answer #7 · answered by SUPERMANMIKE 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Kudos on another absurd question. This past week, President Bush himself said that the USA has "no objection" with Iran's peaceful pursuit of nuclear energy. http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?p=%22objection+to+Iran%27s+pursuit+of+a+truly+peaceful+nuclear+power%22&fr=yfp-t-500&toggle=1&ei=UTF-8&u=go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml%3Ftype%3DtopNews%26storyID%3D13535691%26src%3Drss/topNews&w=%22objection+to+iran%27s+pursuit+of+a+truly+peaceful+nuclear+power%22&d=Nolg_iQ8Nf5V&icp=1&.intl=us
or here http://go.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=13535691&src=rss/topNews
Now, put some pants on and go play outside for awhile.
2006-09-24 04:40:34 · answer #8 · answered by norcalirish 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I dont support nuclear power for either one. But I dont see how its anything less than absurd that Iran should be bullied by the US.
For an example of hypocracy, see the conservative's attitude about how we can have nuclear weapons but they cant.
2006-09-24 04:38:04 · answer #9 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
hey man listen for the pop don't let politicians play both ends against
the middle.
2006-09-24 04:38:14 · answer #10 · answered by koolhand_kent 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I'm liberal and I don't support Iran's efforts...
Wow, you try to make it sound like you understand the whole liberal group but you never do.
What an intelligent and open-minded man!
2006-09-24 04:40:54 · answer #11 · answered by ? 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋