Vince buying TNA would suck more of course.
That would just be Vince being Vince as usual yet should he do it, all his "real" competition would finally be squashed.
In the meantime, TNA is giving him a real competitive run for his money.
2006-09-24 06:51:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by c0171♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
mikeawesome and beach blonde... i got a good place u can take you're opinions and put em!!!! Undertaker is the best wrestler ever. He's the most respected by the fans and the superstarts. If Taker only throws a few punches and hits a Tombstone, then y don't u get in the ring with him? He's still the best, and 10 years hasnt slowed him down! Sure, he's older and slower, but he's like tequilla... gets better the older he gets and is more entertaining! He's the Phenom and the industry of the WWE would fall apart without him. So, if u don't mind keepin your disrespectful mouths shut, i think everyone else out there would greatly appreciate it. Now, answering the question. Taker will loose to Kennedy cuz of cheating or he'll win by DQ like all his matches cuz no one can beat him, so the worst thing is buying TNA cuz we dont need a bunch of second rate, half breed, wannabes in the WWE!!!!!!!!
2006-09-24 21:12:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Taterbug 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Undertaker beating Mr. Kennedy at No Mercy. Undertaker was a good wrestler 10 years ago but he is old and just throws punches and does his finisher. Thats it. Of course if Vince bought TNA it would turn into TNC..Total Non-Stop Crap.
2006-09-24 14:13:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Beach Blonde 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
undertaker beats mr kennedy at no mercy and stop showing up afterwards like he always does
2006-09-25 11:09:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bling Bling 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Vince bought TNA. All they would do is try to rehash the WWF WCW rivalry, but it wouldn't work because that was so seven years ago. Besides, no one watches TNA and no one has any idea who their stars are, so why would Vince overload his payroll with nobodys? I mean, Monty Brown, A.J. Styles, Ron Killings, Petey Williams and maybe the New Age Outlaws yeah, but you can keep the rest.
2006-09-24 11:31:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Special nobody 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Vince won't shell out big bucks for such crappy wrestling brand. Instead he'll buy his bigger, younger stars for a fraction of the franchise price. Stars such as Samoa Joe for example
Undertaker is old, and slow. He can't compete on the every week basis. We'll see him only in major PPV's such as Wrestlemania, to have his winning steak flowing.
The boogey man vs undertaker could've been a great match to look at. too bad for the boogey man, he missed his big bucks chance.
2006-09-24 11:51:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by WWE Insider! 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
vince mcmahon bought tna and hacked those wrestlers too that would be worse
2006-09-24 11:44:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Vince cant just buy TNA, you would have to say your for sale in the first place. Undertaker sucks! Hes only in WWE for the paycheck.
2006-09-24 11:03:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by MikeAwesome 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
the first one...because if undertaker isn't around...then sd will just be a pile of dung!!
vince can but tna anytime he wants...the problem is he doesn't want to because its full of former wwe superstars
2006-09-25 04:52:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cirno 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
vince buying tna would suck more! taker never shows up right after a ppv, so it doesn't make a difference...
@mikeawesome: the only one who sucks is you! you're just a jealous sob!
2006-09-24 13:15:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋