As the mounting death toll in Iraq (2973and rising) has gone past the September 11th mass murder suicide total. Which country/people will the USA turn on and blame for all their woes?
A cycle of repression/conspiracy leads to further repression and conspiracy, and so tyrany is born.
2006-09-24 02:20:33 · 23 answers · asked by Ashley K 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
the countries he is talking up the most are syria and iran. i would guess he goes to the apparently weaker of the two - syria.
i don't think it matters who he goes for really, as the next attack will probably be a spark for ww3. with this in mind he will probably try and get his poodle - israel - to cause more trouble first. however, in light of their recent failure, i think he may have trouble convincing them.
in the mean time, i guarantee that iran, syria and many of the arab countries have increased spending on arms. esp. in light of the recent (in the last few days) motion they put to the UN being blocked by the western powers. this motion called for israel to disarm it's nuclear weapons as it is the only country in the region who has them. as this bid has failed, i'm sure it has united countries in the middle east that previously where sitting on the fence.
hold tight, it looks like countries are strapping themselves in for lift off !!!
2006-09-24 03:04:11 · answer #1 · answered by sofiarose 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They're probably attacking other people right now. That's the way the U.S. military works. They're always somewhere killing someone. The thing is that the American public rarely knows about it.
The U.S. military is running thin, so they can't really attack anyone on a large scale at this point. I don't think they're even stupid enough to attack Iran. They couldn't finish the job.
This Iraq thing won't pan out either.
Those boys and girls should be rounded up and brought back home.
2006-09-24 02:27:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Iran, probably by proxy. Why?...because of their oil.
Israel will hit them with nuclear weapons, turn around and tell us again that they did it for all of "us".
I also have an eye on Venezuela. May be the Bush gouvernment is losing patience after more than 30 unsuccessful plots to get a right wing puppet regime re-instated.
Call me a cynic, but I've been known to be right in the past.
2006-09-24 02:37:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
likely !! yet no longer for the reason you've stated (although curiously He ought to assert this ) yet actualy he needs to get carry on center east Oil substances....... Iran stands third for its oil substances ! even with the indisputable fact that it does no longer ensue that quickly as US is too busy in Iraq and Afghanistan to arise with the money for an different day vacation to Iran ! although they are on their way in planning ! avoid nuclear weapon? LOL, and this time the Biggist nuclear means interior the international is u . s . itself .......How cute !! And Bush ought to no longer educate that Iraq has some guns so absolute self belief of transferring it to syria ! yet Bush would not care that the international is fairly a lot privy to it !
2016-11-23 18:52:37 · answer #4 · answered by selzer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i heard the last count of dead Iraqi`s is nearing 150 thousand 6 thousand in the last 2 months all decent people in Europe are sickened by whats gone on and all for a bunch of lies i think they`ve got their eye on Iran now but i very much doubt if any of Europe would ever join them and i`m even more sure that England will stay out of it all in future after the slimy **** Blair wouldnt join the rest of Europe in calling for a cease fire in lebanon his own party turned on him and 14 even resigned and the poll statistics saythe majority of English people say they will only vote for a party that will distance itself from American policy
2006-09-24 02:44:11 · answer #5 · answered by keny 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well it looks like Iran, the only thing stopping them at the moment is the fact it would create world war 3. I think they will infiltrate the goverment organizations with CIA operatives, by doing this they will have an influence on policies, and be able to change them to a more western culture tolerent people.
2006-09-24 02:35:58 · answer #6 · answered by Glenn M 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If I were to place a bet on it, it would be Iran. Oil, and nuclear weapons research facilities to boot. The question is, will Bush find adequate justification for bombing Iran without staging another catastrophic terrorist attack?
2006-09-24 02:27:06 · answer #7 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I predict, due to a terrible misunderstanding in the White House, the US will attack itself and lose. Oh, and the draft will be reinstated to make this possible!
2006-09-24 02:31:13 · answer #8 · answered by something'srotten 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do think that usa will attack some other countries WITH THE AID OF OTHER countries, but eventually they will also be attacked quite badly leading to thier destruction, destabilisation and chaos.
2006-09-24 02:26:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
As soon as they finsh siphoning all of iraq's oil
United states will turn her attention to Iran and drain their reserves as well.
Every single dollar America spent on war on terror will be fully recovered from Iraq.
2006-09-24 02:32:33 · answer #10 · answered by olayinka o 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋