English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I can't find much to disagree with him on, he is just speaking what most of us feel, and being persecuted for it.....Maybe he isn't the devil per say, but I don't believe in the devil anyway, I have to agree with most of what he was saying

2006-09-24 02:12:06 · 16 answers · asked by ndussere 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

16 answers

OF COURSE NOT!! I don't agree.
How dare he insult the devil like that, when there are far worse villains to name Bush after?

I mean... or are there? Is Bush a class all by himself?

2006-09-24 02:20:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You are an uneducated moron! Chavez is a subhuman commie scumbag that should never be allowed to set foot on US soil again, and granted Bush is not perfect, but he is our President, and I wouldn't give a rats behind if it was any of our worst Presidents, such as Clinton, Carter, or Ford... that Chavez remarked about, I'd still ban him from the USA, and in retaliation to Chavez's remarks, I will never buy another drop of Citgo gasoline again, and all other loyal US citizens should do the same.

2006-09-24 09:23:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Chavez is reacting to the Balboa plan and Pat Robertson's faux pas (sheer stupidity) that he should be assassinated. As I understand it, the Balboa plan is one of many that our government formulated for various nations as a response to aggression on the part of Argentina. Nations formulate contingency response plans. All nations have these. Argentina has them as well. This begs the question, 'What was the motivation behind Chavez's speech'? I believe that Chavez is weighing in on which side his nation intends to take in a 'world conflict' and giving us notice that his nations oil exports to us means nothing to Argentina but could mean a great deal to America. This type of political posturing when world events seem to be surging toward a global conflict is irresponsible and furthers the anti-american PR campaign that actively seeks to divide America. It's the age old game, "Divide and conquer" and should be seen for what it is. Politics. However, now that Chevron has discovered one of the richest oil fields in American history his (Chavez's) point has become moot. Let us hope that world leaders (including our own) will stop the negative rhetoric and embrace/respect our cultural differences as they expect their citizenry to do within their own borders.

2006-09-24 09:54:09 · answer #3 · answered by anon_y_muse 2 · 0 0

Obviously Bush doesn't give a s#$t.

Either way, Bush isn't making life here in America much better. He's trying his best to take away Social Security, welfare, medicare, cut educational programs, enforce microchipping of humans in the name of "security" (you can type in the keyword RFID if some of you muthaf#$$as think I' off and it's been on CNN, MSNBC, FOX, you name it. In fact type in "microchip" at youtube.com and you'll see the actual footage of the microchip law.)

Pretty soon America will be a country just for the elite and everyone else will just be left to suffer.

But then again , it already is for the elite.....

2006-09-24 09:31:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 1 0

I thought about this and I should of been offended that this man come's into my country and bad mouth's my president, but that isn't how I felt. What bother's me more is how anyone that disagree's with this group is called names and told they should leave this country. This country was born by people that stood up to a government that they didn't agree with, and if we lose that then we no longer have the america that I was born into and love.

2006-09-24 09:38:23 · answer #5 · answered by Bigm 1 · 1 0

He is a smart man who watches out television and in prompted and coached by the democrat and liberal professor he had with him at his conventions and speeches......it got to a point when the democrats saw the reaction from the people was negative on what chavez said so as all democrats do they reversed there backing and publicly spoke in defense of our president...go figure.....the whole political party thing are a bunch of crook lying sheep.....

2006-09-24 09:24:32 · answer #6 · answered by lost&confused 5 · 0 0

I can't stand the job Bush is so incompetently doing in and to this country. But having a foreign leader get up and spell it out was rude and insulting. I think we have lost the meaning of diplomacy in the world and we are setting the stage for mindless name-calling.

2006-09-24 09:24:44 · answer #7 · answered by justa 7 · 0 0

He is expressing his right to freedom of speech which he doesnt allow in his own country. Do really think that this power hungry person cares for the people of the world? He just critisizes everything that Bush does.

2006-09-24 09:21:12 · answer #8 · answered by ash_m_79 6 · 1 0

I think he's being chastised for saying publicly what a lot of people leave in thought. In reality, much worse has been said of Bush, just not as widely heard.

2006-09-24 09:19:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

people like you should most likely move from the US. go live with Mr Chavez's regime and see what living in a third world is like. And by the way, how can you say "what most of us feel", your a complete idiot and i am ashamed by your comment.

2006-09-24 09:16:02 · answer #10 · answered by jtaylor 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers