Just to be difficult im guessing !
2006-09-24 01:51:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Not_a_toothless_pirate 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
nicely it style of appears like it would make the ethical regulations of christianity relative. historically, christian ethics is absolutist. it is incorrect to scouse borrow through fact god mentioned so is an occasion. in the event that they admit that for the period of a few circumstances stealing is right, then stealing is not an absolute prohibition. and if stealing is made appropriate by utilising the circumstances, then its somewhat the circumstances that be certain morality, not the be conscious of god. the main suitable that the ten commandments can do then is furnish regularly occurring regulations of a thank you to stay. i think of thats what could be at the back of a christian concern of outrage ethics. god's be conscious is, at maximum suitable, a regularly occurring thought of a thank you to stay, and his regulations could be disobeyed through fact the area demands. situationist ethics appears like a consequentialist ethics, comparing the morality of an action by utilising the consequencs it is probable to have (the area). Christian ethics are deontological - they evaluate morality by utilising no be counted if or not the act in question breaks regulations. So a conflict between them might in all probability mirror the familiar conflict between consequentialism and deontological ethics: ought to we destroy regulations while breaking the regulations makes issues extra appropriate?
2016-12-15 13:24:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christians are raised to believe in right and wrong. Just because the situation has changed does not mean that what is wrong or what is right has changed.
To murder someone in cold blood is worng!
2006-09-24 01:52:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They believe that certain rules can apply to all situations that can be used to determine ethics.
2006-09-24 15:56:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Michael M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋