English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i really want to know this answer!!!

2006-09-24 01:00:48 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Other - News & Events

7 answers

Because he is a shamed, evil man who, had it been a normal person, would have gone to jail. I'm sorry to any Jackson "fans", but that trial was swizzed.

2006-09-24 01:49:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Micheal Jackson was found Not Guilty of the charges against him. Therefore he Did Not moleste the child in question.

I also believe that he didnt do any such thing.

2006-09-24 08:09:28 · answer #2 · answered by theguyintelford 3 · 0 0

He was aquitted, which means in the eyes of the law, he is not guilty. Therefore, he didn't "molester" the kid.

2006-09-24 08:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by surfinthedesert 5 · 1 0

well i dont think he did molester that kid and he wasnt convicted of the crime either

2006-09-24 08:02:53 · answer #4 · answered by fear_fox 3 · 1 0

becuase he is a sick sick man who's child hood was ripped away from him from his B a r s t e r d father

2006-09-24 14:44:53 · answer #5 · answered by Huggles [mozzafan] 4 · 0 0

He wasn't found guilty, but he's still a sick puppy!

2006-09-24 08:10:24 · answer #6 · answered by tracy211968 6 · 0 0

he didnt they just wanted his money

2006-09-24 08:08:11 · answer #7 · answered by Red Sawx ® 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers