Because he is a shamed, evil man who, had it been a normal person, would have gone to jail. I'm sorry to any Jackson "fans", but that trial was swizzed.
2006-09-24 01:49:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Micheal Jackson was found Not Guilty of the charges against him. Therefore he Did Not moleste the child in question.
I also believe that he didnt do any such thing.
2006-09-24 08:09:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by theguyintelford 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was aquitted, which means in the eyes of the law, he is not guilty. Therefore, he didn't "molester" the kid.
2006-09-24 08:02:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by surfinthedesert 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
well i dont think he did molester that kid and he wasnt convicted of the crime either
2006-09-24 08:02:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by fear_fox 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
becuase he is a sick sick man who's child hood was ripped away from him from his B a r s t e r d father
2006-09-24 14:44:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Huggles [mozzafan] 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He wasn't found guilty, but he's still a sick puppy!
2006-09-24 08:10:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by tracy211968 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
he didnt they just wanted his money
2006-09-24 08:08:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Red Sawx ® 6
·
0⤊
0⤋