war on terrorism?

Question

bushs war on terrorism has realy decreased terorrism?

Answer 1

Yes, more terrorists are being created, because none of the government or CIA responsible for the terrorism of 9/11 have yet been brought to justice, but they have alienated so many others who were previously peaceful, that more terrorism occurs.
One very significant point is the depleted uranium in Iraq.
The radiation from the DU shells is causing so much pain and anguish to Iraqis that many of them know they are doomed to die from the cancers thy have caught from the radiation.
So, in order to get rid of the pain, they don't mind killing themselves, and may as well take some of those whom they see responsible with them.
This is why there are so many suicide bombers - because so many people are affected by radiation from the DU weapons, including American soldiers.

Depleted uranium video
http://elequity.com/du/DU.swf

Depleted Uranium - Far Worse Than 9/11
For hundreds of years to come, the effects of the uranium will continue to wreak ... "American forces admit to using over 300 tons of DU weapons in 1991. ...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060503&articleId=2374

Answer 2

You're question is obviously prejudicial. Terrorists compel nations to address them. We simply gave them the attention they thought they wanted. Yet, now we're the bad guys? Too basic for even the most illiterate minds. We didn't crash those planes into our own buildings (though some truely simple minded people cling to that ridiculous hope). Would you have preferred that we say " Oh well, gee thats bad" and go on about our merry way? Now that we've made inroads into their destructive organizations would you have us throw it all away and say that's enough when clearly the job is unfinished? When attacked America responds. Understand that. It is our way, has always been our way and that will never change despite your opinion. The historical litany of our perceived sins against the world will not deter, nor weigh heavily in our reaction to threats against our nation. While American citizens may not agree upon how best to go about the defense of our nation we still stand for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for our citizens, encourage debate and dissent and frankly that's more freedom than most of the worlds citizenry enjoys. We will not, as some have questioned on these pages, engage in civil war. Ludicrous. Terrorists are cancerous tumors in society. We will excise them and frankly that can get a little bloody.

Answer 3

It has reduced it by killing a bunch of those sorry S.O.B.'s called muslim extremists. There are thousands more that we still need to get though. Another thing, why do you refer to it as Bush's War on Terrorism? He didn't start the war, the islamic terrorists did. It's the entire worlds problem. Bush was the only one who had the balls to call it what it really is. Islamofacism!

Answer 4

that's a conflict against a virulent, bastardized form of Islam. the priority is that many Muslims are afraid to communicate out against it for many motives. whether, that's crucial that average Muslims communicate out and take care of their faith from those evil zealots that have twisted it right into a form of fascism. till that happens, many harmless people of all faiths will loose efficient lives and treasure. it incredibly is an historic turning factor in Islam. Will or no longer that could be a faith of life or a faith of loss of life by way of fact the terrorists declare? The President describe the Axis of Evil as Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and North Korea. there has been no substitute to the coverage of coping with all 4. Afghanistan and Iraq are being dealt with. Iran will probable be dealt with next in spite of the indisputable fact that what form that is going to take isn't sparkling. North Korea has been constrained by making use of the chinese language yet remains a probability as long as Kim Jung Il is in fee. .

Answer 5

No, it's created more terrorists. No one from Iraq had attacked us. We left Afganistan, where the supposed terrorists were, to go to Iraq to get Saddam. Who had never done anything to us. The whole thing, since before 9/11, was planned, set up, and executed by Bush, Cheney, Rove, and Rumsfeld. They should all be arrested for treason.

Answer 6

Absolutely not.Bush started all the wars.Just think how Bin Laden could do such things?Ha?
All the terror attacks were well organised.Could those poor afghans do that????????Read more about it,dear

Answer 7

Why Bush alone should do it?India ,Israel ,U.K.and many countries are doing it without meeting of minds.Terrorism is a global problem needing global response.Then only it will go down.

Answer 8

i cnt believe ppl r stil goin on abt it... wot gets me is thik ppl hu cant see thru the bloody government and y dey r doin all this in the first place... power... so many things have been PROVEN by AMERICAN SCIENTISTS that cant happen wen they say it did.. i cant b bothrd xplainin anymore...

Answer 9

an excuse for mass genocide

Answer 10

What do you think? We haven't been attacked again.