English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

Why am i outta room?

2006-09-23 20:06:57 · 7 answers · asked by 911blogger.com 1 in Science & Mathematics Earth Sciences & Geology

7 answers

First of all, who said any hijackers turned up alive?

Rigging the twin towers with bombs would have taken months to do, and during those months, the interior of all of the outward facing (exterior) would have to be torn out to install the bombs on the structural steel of the building. I think someone would have noticed if the walls of their offices were torn out.

Remember the live video of the planes crashing into the towers? You wouldn't need bombs to bring down the towers because the way those buildings were designed, with a outer steel cage and minimal structural support in the middle to maximize interior space, all you would need to do to bring down the buildings would be to puncture the steel cage in the exterior walls.

As far as the pentagon is concerned, it is designed in 5 rings, each structurally separate and supported by massive steel columns. There are so many of these columns, that when the plane crashed into the pentagon, it was like running the plane through a meat grinder. The plane, being hollow and light (hence the ability to fly) was completely shredded by these columns, and could not penetrate very far into the building. Most of what was left was easily melted by the fire.

What speed would you like the towers to fall at? What is the reason for expecting it was anything other than gravity that caused the towers to fall? What other force is there that causes objects to fall to earth when they are no longer supported by something?

So knock it off until you do your homework on this issue. Read something besides conspiracy websites.

By the way, I'm a democrat who never voted for Bush.

2006-09-24 07:24:14 · answer #1 · answered by Nick Hahn 2 · 0 0

There were supposed to be more planes hijacked . The angle of trajectory at which the plane flew into the pentagon , if you remember a few years ago the was a jet that crashed in the everglades . There was very little recovered from that scene .The metal from the engines would have been fragmented by the impact so much , that only small pieces would have remained .What thermite ? AA contracts , to help the country get back on track .We were trying to improve relations with China at the time .Most of the phones used were air phones or satellite phones . recent show on History channel , there was a train station under the tower that had to fill with debris before it went out the front doors at ground level . Gravity is gravity . Firefighters saw electric panels and bulbs blowing out, short circuits. Stop with the conspiracy theories . It can all be explained scientifically .

2006-09-24 05:06:19 · answer #2 · answered by rocknrod04 4 · 0 0

Conspiracy theories abound Would you fight a buy wioth a boxcutter? Are you aware a boxcutter is a sharp knife, and it will open you up just as easily as a box? If a plane didn't hit the Pentagon, where did it go? Where did the people go? Oh, right, the tv show, "Lost". Why would anybody offer a lone janitor millions of dollars to keep quiet if they were willing to kill other people? Doesn't make sense to anybody but a conspiracy theorist. Have you ever watched any of the tv shows showing people blowing down buildings? Not a one of them duplicates the crashing of the towers. Demolition charges to bring down the towers would have to have been placed inside columns on many levels of the buildings. Bombs would not do, the columns would all have to have been weakened. It would have taken a crew months of drilling, and hundreds of miles of cord to do what the conspiracy theorists insist happened. I'm not out of room, but I am tired of this crap that seems to keep coming back, just like dog poop in the yard.

2006-09-23 20:28:28 · answer #3 · answered by Fred C 7 · 1 0

About Me
Member since: May 10, 2006
Best Answers:
Points earned this week:
Total points: 6,670 (Level 5)



There were no planes and no hijackers - see below.
It was a missile that hit the pentagon.
No plane, therefore no engines.
Thermite was used in the controlled demolition.
The perpetrators knew before hand and wanted to make money on the stock exchange.
Evidence sols as part of the cover-up.
No planes, no passengers, no cell phones.
William Rodriguez offered money as part of cover-up
Towers fell at speed of gravity because all controlled demolitions fall that way.
The firefighters saw reality
Larry Silverstein made a mistake.

Manufactured terrorism
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/ma...

No-planes important
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/ma...

2006-09-23 23:28:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

do you be responsive to what a boxcutter is? do you be responsive to how briskly someone can bleed to loss of life if the jugular vane is decrease? is this the ceremony place to be asking those questuon`s? do you be responsive to you will on no account get the respond`s to those question`s here? what are you going to do approximately it in case you get even a million answer to a million of your question`s? will anybody have faith you in case you proove any of the respond`s to be actual?Or did you purely have too lots time on your hand`s writing those question`s?

2016-10-01 07:33:28 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because this is about earth science.

2006-09-23 20:31:31 · answer #6 · answered by mattomynameo 4 · 0 0

because it's the yahoo law

2006-09-24 00:58:11 · answer #7 · answered by bprice215 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers