Maybe next time we should pick a President with no C.I.A. connections. Maybe someone with social skill wouldn't hurt either.
Is this a situation bad enough to get people to get out and vote?
2006-09-23 19:45:35 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
No the C.I.A. caused most of these problems. They have no business being in power.
2006-09-23 23:34:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummm, how is having the son of a former CIA head any worse than having the former CIA head himself as President? I don't think we need to limit a person's options because of anything a parent has done. I am the child of a child molester; does that mean that I should be banned from every job with any contact with children or any social status? We need to judge people, especially our leaders, by their own records. I have never been a supporter of either President Bush but I don't think that he is so bad that Americans will flock to the polls, especially when he is not up for reelection.
2006-09-23 19:54:00 · answer #2 · answered by Kuji 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the Big Business connections that got Bush in office,along
with the general apathy and sheep mentality of the American people. As for getting people to get out there and vote-if this disaster won't do it,nothing well.
2006-09-24 07:55:55 · answer #3 · answered by Alion 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very Bad idea indeed. The Papa Bush was a thorough coward as he banned the press to cover an award cermony for USS Liberty survivors. He and Baker did not enter the room to honor those brave US mariens who were deliberately killed by Israel (www.usssliberty.org) Bbay Bush is even more coward. Bush knows very well that 9/11 is a blatent act of Israel like attack on USS Liberty (www.usssliberty.org) and attack on WTC on 26th February 1993 by Israel through its Mossad agent Josie Hadas (Whos appartment with bomb drawing and material appeared on Un-censored CNN breaking news). However she was handed over to Israel after mission accomplished. Israel and Zionists are using these terrorist acts to defame Islam and Muslims and to gain sympathy. Of course they have pseudo enemies whom they erect in the first place e.g. Yaser Arafat, Qaddafi, Saddam, Hizbullah etc. So when they want to carry out a larger and most devastating terrorism they use one of their pseudo enemy to carry out something small to create a justification e.g in order to occupy Lebanon through UNO, capturing of two Israeli soldiers by so called Hizbullah. As most if not all media is in the hands of Zionists, almost every body except a few wise one believe in their dirty and false propagenda.
2006-09-23 19:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by pathowiz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, no, and no.
First of all George H.W. Bush is not the head of the CIA. I don't think W is as dumb as he looks, I do however think he is a horrible public speaker, something that can't really be taught. How can you not have CIA connections as the President, your the President.
2006-09-23 19:48:31 · answer #5 · answered by gq1412@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey two war criminals from the same family !!
don't even elect Jeb should he try to run!!!! Maybe this could help the independent cause but mostly stop election by monetary
clout a very poor way to go!!!!!! one cannot expect the rapacious filthy rich to be morally centered! NO MORE WARMONGERS
2006-09-23 20:28:47 · answer #6 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not much different than having the son of a bootlegger as president.
For those of you in public school, that would be Kennedy.
2006-09-23 19:54:29 · answer #7 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was elected . Dream up another conspiracy . That one was too bogus from the first word .
2006-09-23 19:48:47 · answer #8 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
2006-09-23 19:47:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋