i havent seen an equation like the one i came up with before and i think that my equation is true.
with my equation i can find the distance between the nucleus of the atom to the electron, the only variable that i need to know is the energy in a certain orbital. (like the work function or the ionization energy)
please i need your opinion. i need to know if you have ever heard of something like that?
P.S is not the bohr planetary model of the atom.
I am not going to tell you the equation because probably it is unique and I want to get the credit for it lol.
2006-09-23 18:24:54 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
First of all I would need to see your work to tell you if you might have something. Most likely you don't. The electron in an atom does not have a fix distance from the nucleus. In reality the electron is all over the place. It only has an average or most probable distance.
The most advance theories we have can only calculate the probabily of the electon being at a certain distance. It is not a problem with the theories it is the nature of the electron.
2006-09-23 18:35:11 · answer #1 · answered by georgephysics13 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are already equations using those energy values, so make sure you don't just have a simplified version of those equations. Check your derivation and compare it to Physical Chemistry books.
I will acknowledge that it is possible that you have something, and I fully understand your reluctance to post it, I would do the same. I'd say just compare it and show it to someone you trust if you can. Good luck!!
And to some of those other answerers....shut the hell up! You obviously left it vague because you don't know much on the topic. So why criticize and act like you do?
2006-09-24 01:57:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm pretty sure that there are ways(equations) of finding that information. An atomic radius is calculated from the nucleus to the outer electrons so they have to have had a way to find that distance since we know those radii
2006-09-24 01:27:24 · answer #3 · answered by Greg G 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think we have seen the inside of an atom, and since the Bohr's and others are only MODELS, it doesn't mean they are right.
2006-09-24 01:50:29 · answer #4 · answered by icez 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should publish.
2006-09-24 01:43:59 · answer #5 · answered by bruinfan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you may have devrived it from another equation.
2006-09-24 02:26:12 · answer #6 · answered by superlaminal 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont't believe!!!!
2006-09-24 01:31:01 · answer #7 · answered by Juan D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋