English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is easy to lable someone without thinking and using abusive language. Let us suppose if USA were to be occupied by foreign forces. And then some American young men to fight back by any mean, will you consider them suicide bombers? When India attacked Pakistan in 1965, some people wrapped bombs on their bodies and went under the advancing tanks and stopped the advance of enemy's tanks. Would you call them suicide bombers? Should they have allowed the enemy to occupy and then kill thousands? Why not critisize the people who are using global terrorism and drop daisey cutters, Napalm bombs, 20,000 pound bombs on wedding parties, tanks and F 16! It is only Muslims, I see who resist against all odds. Children with stones in their hands facing tanks!!. Should we salute these couarageous youth or condemn? Of course they are not going somehwere to kill innocent people. The media is in the hands of Gobal Terrorists and arm manufacturers who are making big bucks on blood and miseries of poor

2006-09-23 17:44:58 · 9 answers · asked by pathowiz 3 in News & Events Other - News & Events

Some people have taken dictionary meaning of suicide which is not correcty. Sucide is committed by those peopel who are depressed and find no way out but to kill themselves. Here motive is not that at all. Here killing is carried out for: 1)
Freeing country or nation from foreign and brutal occupation 2) For prevention of further killings as these the foreign forces are not given tough time they will widen and deepen their State Terrorism. It is unofrtuante that all answers here so far given are based on utter dishonesty and lack of conscince. I used to respect Americans a lot and used to consider them very fair people, however if the naswers here refelct the majority (Which I hope not) then the America has already lost its moral and ethiocal stand. We know that all Governments are bad, but what about common Americans. whom I still respect and consider to be the most fair people that's why I hope these answers are from Zionsts and their brain washed maggots. We must not support wrong

2006-09-23 19:00:11 · update #1

9 answers

It's really not worth my time to try to reply to individuals with as low an IQ as you obviously have.

2006-09-23 17:55:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

There only suicide bombers if they commit suicide with a bomb. So to your first question about Americans it depends on how they were fighting. The Indians would be suicide bombers. Kids with rocks are throwing rocks are cans be call heros or law breakers. It depends on the situation. In Isreal they are law breakers and for attacking a military vehicle it is assumed that they can be shot, but it is a waste and don't really see why they do it. Normally the don't get shot and it makes them look hard core. But it is against the law and they shouldn't be called heros for it. Daisey cutters are very humain bombs they really aren't very effective for killing because you can only carry one per flight, they are mostly used as a form of intimidation. A way to scare the enemy into giving up. And what wedding party incident are you talking? I don't doubt that it happend I would just like to read about it, so I can be better informed.
Thanks

2006-09-24 04:04:56 · answer #2 · answered by Out a no where Dan 2 · 0 0

And what about those who took children hostages in the Russian school and blew them up? Those who attached the civilians on 11/9? And those who killed 70 tourists in Upper Egypt and shot themselves to death, do you find them heroes?
They are brainwashed people who hates everyone even themselves.

Although I appreciate those who stands for their countries those is the true resistance.

2006-09-24 08:41:59 · answer #3 · answered by NsmV 1 · 1 0

Individuals attacking military targets & tanks are suicide bombers.
The Japanese kama kazi pilots of WW2 were suicide bombers..
Individuals attacking civilians are fanatical terrorist homocide bombers...
What we are seeing from the fanatical muslims is terrorism & homocide bombings of the most cowardly despicable kind...

2006-09-24 00:59:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What exactly is your question?

All I see here is a poorly framed, incoherent historical retrospective on the apparent need to re-address the "negative portrayal" of brainwashed Islamists that strap explosives to their bodies and destroy innocent lives.

2006-09-24 00:58:57 · answer #5 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 3 0

Well, if you kill yourself, it's suicide. If you set off a bomb, your a bomber. So suicide bomber is a good label.

2006-09-24 00:54:59 · answer #6 · answered by snidy 4 · 2 0

Suicide is when you kill yourself. That is what these terrorist are doing. But sadly they kill Innocent people as well so that makes them murders!

2006-09-24 01:07:27 · answer #7 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 2 0

I support our military and call those who blow themselves up to kill our men & women in uniform "suicide bombers."

2006-09-24 00:55:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

What do you call an individual who straps explosives to himself and goes into a crowd of people to detonate it? What is YOUR word for it???

2006-09-25 16:58:24 · answer #9 · answered by Shaar 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers