There are a lot of 3rd parties out there.
The libertarians are the largest, and have won a few minor elections. They are the exception.
But what about the obscure 3rd parties, that have all these great sounding patriotic names?
As it ever dawned on them that scaring people to death doesn't work? As an example, the Prohibition Party, wants to legislate morality and ban all alcohol, the Constition Party just wants guns everywhere and are lead by Pat Buchannan wanna be's, etc.
Of course, they hate gov't funding......but they ALL want federal matching funds! Hypocrites.
I'm not against 3 parties. But unless they quit being extremists, they will never win. If they are so smart, why can't they get elected?
My question is, why do obscure 3rd parties have patriotic names, when they are nothing more than extremists?
2006-09-23 17:39:07 · 10 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Scubdog....who's trying to take your gun? No one. Another example why 3rd parties just scare people.
PS....I one a gun too.
2006-09-23 18:17:49 · update #1
Because "Rightwing Nutjobs" doesn't look good on a T-shirt.
2006-09-23 17:43:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me being patriotic does not merely mean you have been in the defense force. To be patriotic you have got self belief in the form. McCain could actual be saluted for his patriotic contribution to usa yet no longer president. He has continuously shown his help for large employer and Bush ideology. by using out history a relentless conflict of the wealthy trampling the unfavourable or workers has prevailed. The shape magnificently created a instruction manual that could end this ideology for ever. the wealthy could be wealthy as long as they did no longer trample the unfavourable. however the wealthy are never happy no rely how wealthy they are they choose greater and with the ability they continuously trample the staff. the main patriotic presidential candidate i do no longer even remember his call i've got self belief it is Barr plus i think of he belongs to the form occasion additionally Nader leans greater to keeping the customer and has for over twenty years neither could succumb to company welfare that has replaced the previous welfare device.
2016-12-12 13:55:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. They are too extreme, and tend to be very far to the right, and out of touch with america.
And they aren't smart, or they would be able to win. The constition party are nut cases that love Pat Buchannan.
If Americans wanted their nutty ideas.....they'd be in power, somewhere. They aren't.
2006-09-23 17:41:30 · answer #3 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its more than obvious that you know NOTHING about the Constitution Party or Second amendment rights.
Read our platform and then tell me we are all about guns.
Its our Constitutional right to own firearms. Isnt it ironic that filthy liberals only adhere to the Constitution when it parallels their opinion?
Its okay to burn an American flag as a freedom of speech. But the liberals want to outlaw firearms. Hilarious. This is just one model of liberal hypocrisy.
2006-09-23 18:14:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Or how bout the Bull Moose party!
2006-09-23 17:53:21 · answer #5 · answered by battle-ax 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cos left-wing nutjobs doesn't really inspire followers.
2006-09-23 17:55:00 · answer #6 · answered by 14Words 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
To help remember the cause.
2006-09-23 17:41:12 · answer #7 · answered by eugene65ca 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because they think they can lure moderates into their ranks.
2006-09-23 17:47:50 · answer #8 · answered by Mr.happy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you like it in the a@s you pile of steamy sh*t.
2006-09-23 17:42:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
well if you sound important, then you are important. Right? Right? Hey now............( too exteme?)
2006-09-23 17:41:58 · answer #10 · answered by mr_fixit_11 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋