English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay, put aside whether her comments about Steve Irwin were valid (I think a consensus has been reached on this). Does anyone think it was okay to publish this garbage the day after he died?

Was this just the desperate attempt of a has been to get noticed? Is simply trying to get noticed what she has been trying to do for the last 40 years?

How else can we explain her book "the beautiful boy" which contains 200 photos of teenage boys and caused the guardian to describe her as a "middle aged pederast"?

2006-09-23 16:20:56 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

5 answers

Her ego is too big for her intellect.

2006-09-23 22:16:43 · answer #1 · answered by eva b 5 · 0 0

Germaine Greer. A self appointed spokes-woman for women's rights.
She's nothing but a vulgar loud-mouth who used the 'Liberated Female' movement to gain fame. She has no medical or psychiatric training. When she was on a TV she would generally shout people down so they couldn't get a word in.

She probably wrote the book 'The Female Eunuch', as her attack on males for not lusting after, chasing, wanting her as an in demand must have female during her years at college. (The Miss Haversham syndrome).

If she cared for the female struggle she would have given her ideas/information away for free. But she, like a lot women did, and are still doing, is cash in on a very popular up and coming, money making market.
And females fell for it, and are STILL falling for it.

I don't think the Australians like her at all.
She was once editor of SCREW MAGAZINE a New York-based pornographic tabloid newspaper. She's also an ex-groupie.

Some insane outbursts from Greer.
"Women don't realize how much men hate them and how much they are taught to hate themselves."
"If you think you are emancipated, you might consider the idea of tasting your menstrual blood - if it makes you sick, you have a long way to go, baby."

2006-09-24 07:33:40 · answer #2 · answered by Norman Bates 4 · 0 0

She's an A S S !! The worst part is, she's only as influential as the amount of people who listen to her. Stop giving her attention. Then, she'll crawl back to her bedroom, and play with herself as she does every day while watching Oprah and the View.

2006-09-24 04:11:32 · answer #3 · answered by nice_boobs 2 · 0 0

she is a womans liber and a lesbain isn't she?.

2006-09-23 16:58:13 · answer #4 · answered by expatriot1000 4 · 0 0

she has absolutley no tact!!

2006-09-24 12:00:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers