I have a few questions on 9/11..Can Somebody Help Please..?

Question

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

myspace.com/conspiracyalert

Answer 1

You know using Yahoo Questions for the purposes of promoting or advetising a site is a no-no.

This is your umteenth time doing this.

I'm not going to report you, but I am beging to wonder about the credbility of the Loose Change piece in light of this underhanded approach to promotion...

Answer 2

There were no planes and no hijackers - see below.
It was a missile that hit the pentagon.
No plane, therefore no engines.
Thermite was used in the controlled demolition.
The perpetrators knew before hand and wanted to make money on the stock exchange.
Evidence sols as part of the cover-up.
No planes, no passengers, no cell phones.
William Rodriguez offered money as part of cover-up
Towers fell at speed of gravity because all controlled demolitions fall that way.
The firefighters saw reality
Larry Silverstein made a mistake.

Manufactured terrorism
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html

No-planes important
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/matters.html

Answer 3

The problem with conspiracy theories like yours is that you focus on things which can easily be explained away. 9/11 went down just like we all saw it on TV. You focus on this and you miss the real conspiracies that are out there.

Read "Armed Madhouse" by Greg Palast. He lays out the State Department and Pentagon plans for the invasion of Iraq that were in place before Bush ever took office, just waiting for an excuse to be launched. Find out about the Project for a New American Century, which laid out the forced "democratization" of the Middle East as a key element of our foreign policy, long before there ever was a Bush, let alone a Bush doctrine.

The blueprints for everything this administration has done were prepared years ago by conservative think tanks like the Heritage Foundation. It's all there in black and white, and the people who came up with it are only too happy to take credit.

You can mistrust our government without making half-baked suggestions that they are capable of murdering thousands of Americans to achieve their aims. You are playing right into the hands of Karl Rove, who can equate your crazy theories with more rational criticism and write it all off as crazy anti-Americanism.

Answer 4

An inside job is very much possible, people who call people who support this theory anti-american are fooling themselves. If the government did do it, don't you think we owe it to all of those killed to find out about it? It is like foolishly ignoring evidence towards one person in a murder trial simply because you favor them over the other suspect. They are in denial, plain and simple. It is not necessarily true, but it is a definate possibility.