Just keep subtracting 8 to get the next number. It's a simple arithmetic sequence.
2006-09-23 16:03:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by just♪wondering 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
First 64-32 = 32. So the 3 steps must move a total of 32
The middle one would be half that distance, or 16. 32 + 16 = 48
64, ___, 48, ___, 32
The other ones would be half that distance between them, or 8
32 + 8 = 40
48 + 8 = 56
64, 56, 48, 40, 32
(The technical answer is that it could be ANYTHING. This is mathematically true, but the teacher would probably mark that wrong just because it is the smart-alec answer. If you want more info, let me know)
2006-09-23 22:57:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ray M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
64, 56, 48, 40, 32
That would be my best guess, based on the information. Just divide the range of 32 to 64 into 4 segments:
(64-32) / 4 = 32 / 4 = 8
So 8 separates each segment.
2006-09-23 22:57:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by i_sivan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
because I was a math major the common number that they have together is 8 so the correct answer is 64,56,48,40,32. this represents the times table of 8 as we know it:
8 x 1 = 8
8 x 2 = 16
8 x 3 = 24
8 x 4 = 32
8 x 5 = 40
8 x 6 = 48
8 x 7 = 56
8 x 8 = 64
8 x 9 = 72
8 x 10 = 80
Good luck.
Vote for me, please.
2006-09-24 00:08:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by soar_2307 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i won't go into detail about how i found the answer but the ones above are all right. its multiples of 8- 64, 56, 48, 40, 32
2006-09-23 23:45:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by wunluv06 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try, 64, 56, 48, 40, 32.
2006-09-23 22:58:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by brblasz1 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
64, 56, 48, 40, 32
2006-09-23 22:55:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
an = a1 + (n - 1)d
32 = a1 + (5 - 1)d
32 = a1 + 4d
a1 = -4d + 32
64 = -4d + 32
32 = -4d
d = -8
The pattern is
an = 64 - 8(n - 1)
a(2) = 64 - 8(2 - 1)
a(2) = 64 - 8(1)
a(2) = 64 - 8
a(2) = 56
a(3) = 64 - 8(3 - 1)
a(3) = 64 - 8(2)
a(3) = 64 - 16
a(3) = 48
a(4) = 64 - 8(4 - 1)
a(4) = 64 - 8(3)
a(4) = 64 - 24
a(4) = 40
ANS : 56, 48, 40
2006-09-24 01:42:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sherman81 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Isn't it as simple as
64, 56, 48, 40, 32
2006-09-24 07:58:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
multipls of 8
2006-09-23 23:14:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by SdM 4
·
0⤊
0⤋