Why do people think Clinton did nothing to combat terrorism?

Question

I am so sick and tired of Republicans saying Clinton did nothing about that issue!
Listen up! i have enlightened too many ignorant people too many times. But i will do it once more.
http://www.tvnewslies.org/bushbudget.gif

http://www.mikehersh.com/Clinton_vs_Terror_Republicans_vs_Clinton.shtml

Clinton led a great anti-terror campaign. At least with Clinton, the ones who were behind the WTC in 93 were caught and arrested. (Ramzi Yousef and his group)

There! Now maybe you people can stop spreading the right-wing rumors that Clinton did nothing against terrorism?

The thumbs down so far is from a Republican who hates the fact that i stated the truth, which is contrary to his idiotic beliefs. He apparently was too scared to write a response, because he knows i'm right. So he doesn't say anything at all.
PETTY and PATHETIC if you ask me.

AreWeThereYet?, i will answer your questions. First of all, how was Clinton to know there were terrorists within the nation? Bush wouldn't have known, had it been him. He did a lot to protect us against terrorism all the same.
Also, there is an ENORMOUS amount of proof that the Neocons (among them Dick Cheney) were responsible...Bush just followed. Get informed, please.

Answer 1

He did more than the John Wayne clone. Also, Clinton knew how to defuse explosive situations, so there was not this 'modern' insane wish of many Muslims to die, but kill as many Americans as possible in the process. (That was reserved for the Israelis)
I am sure that the Lebanese 'genocide' wouldn't have happened while Clinton was President.
Bush has single-handedly (sorry, he has a 'partner in crime' across the pond) turned the English speaking world (The UK, the US and Australia) into a very much disliked and dangerous part of the international community. And to add insult to injury, he can't even speak the language properly!
But what really amazes me is how gullible a certain part of the American people are: his approval rating is going up!
Bush has declared a 'War on Terror', which is creating more 'terrorists' than even Rambo Rumsfeld can 'hunt down and kill'. Sounds like dumb to me.
And they try to blame Clinton for the mess?

Answer 2

He had 8 chances to kill or capture bin laden, but deferred out of "what about the innocent human casualties!", well, on 9-11 we saw those innocent human casualties, and they were ours.
He sent cruise missiles into afghanistan after our embassies were bombed, (BUT not before notifying the pakistani ISI, who were in cohoots with alqaeda and tipped off alqaeda. So none of the hundreds of missiles killed anyone in the camps since they all evacuated and set up ops somewhere else). Incompetence.
He only did anything in iraq as a distraction on the eve of his impeachment trial. war for oil? how about war for getting some in the oval office.

Clinton didnt prevent the 93' bombing, he only arrested those responsible. this is why there can only be a war on terror, it is not a police action. You can only arrest someone for terrorism after they carry out the act. If the terrorist hasnt done anything wrong, how can you arrest him? if not after the towers get bombed.
Bush went on the offensive and stopped the attacks here.
the planning, financing and training on US soil for the 9-11 attacks happened on Clintons watch. Had they been hunted instead of coddled in a PC loving atmosphere, then maybe a different series of events would have transpired.

and for the tinfoil hatters that think bush did it.
When all the planning, financing and training occured when clinton was in office and bush was governor of texas, did bush plan everything when he was governor? knowing full well he would be president? give me a break.

Answer 3

Because it's convenient and a distraction away from the boys who were actually on the wall when the enemy broke through.

Don't forget Carlos the Jackal was also nabbed during the Clinton Years.

Answer 4

They say it to take the blame off their guy. And who is the easiest scape goat but the "other guy" that was last in office.

I don't know if anyone is really at fault, and no matter what is done, it will not be enough. But I also don't think that inciting hatered for the United States is the key to stopping things, either. But Bush seems to think otherwise, doesn't he?

Answer 5

my friend all president will have some one to say bad think like you said , don't be sick you are not helping him but how you Handel the pressure or question that important,that already in the past let move on to president Bush now.

Answer 6

You have to understand that the repuglicans are the more mentally diminished of the population and get all of their ideas from Rush Limbaugh and repeat it until they think it is true. They get all of their news from Faux news so you if you do not expect much from them because from them as you won't get much in the way of logic.

Answer 7

Because he DID let bin laden get away and he "never" retaliated for the USS Cole attack.