English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm not taking up for the guy 100%, but know it's not just all HIS fault for the mess in the world. It's the crazy jihad's that wants a 'holy war'..and will do everything to start it.

2006-09-23 13:23:14 · 28 answers · asked by Todd V 1 in Politics & Government Government

28 answers

Haha...so true, but people need their scapegoat.

2006-09-23 13:25:55 · answer #1 · answered by catchu 2 · 0 1

As Far As I'm Concerned Bush Can Draft As Many Troops As He Needs, Build The Military Till We Owe A Decifit Of 300 Trillion Dollars,And We Kick The Back Stabbing European Countries Azz(AND U KNOW WHO U R )Just For Old Times Sake, While We Glass The Middle East...Then We Build The Equipment To Recover The Oil No More Raghead Idiot Problem...And This Time Keep France And Germany....

2006-09-23 13:41:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Easy target.
You know, kick the man while he's down. Bush uses this tactic all the time.
Not everyone blames Bush. So this everyone does not include you or the 40% who are wrong.
Silly you, it's already been started where have you been for the last 5 years? Cozying up to the lobbyists, or Bush.
Some of you will just not understand. BUSH DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOU. He just needed your vote, and had to cheat at that.
I cannot do it alone. I am counting on some of you out there to come to your senses and vote for a real change.

2006-09-23 21:32:17 · answer #3 · answered by Schona 6 · 0 0

AND HE'S STILL CLEANING UP THE MESS CLINTON LEFT BEHIND....but everyone wants to blame him because he's not a chicken like Clinton was and is not afraid to do whats right...I mean look what Clinton did while he was in the white house with Monica, and he didn't t go after Ben Laden when he could have,he was CHICKEN,and every ones always talking about Bush lying about wmd,he when on the information he was given,he didn't go over there and do the inventory his self,but Clinton was impeached,and lied and was found out about over Monica...so I don't see the specialness of Clinton...I think he was the shame of the USA and his position, since Nixon...but then everything in the world has turned backwards,what use to be good is now bad and vise vera . So of course he's going to come out the good guy......the world is so screwed up......!!!!!!!!!

2006-09-23 13:40:39 · answer #4 · answered by purpleaura1 6 · 0 0

Many people are blaming Bush for not being wiser in his decisions. Like any diplomat, he should have seen the repercussions that the military was going to face fighting two wars at the same time. Instead of making Iraq safer, the war in Iraq has allowed for radicals to come and infiltrate a weak country.

2006-09-23 13:28:06 · answer #5 · answered by thirdeyeblind_5 2 · 0 0

Action creates reaction.

Muslim fundamentalism and terrorism was on rise in many countries, and they where killing and destroying the property of non-muslims world wide.

Pakistan, Saudi Arbia, Newly created countires of the erstwhile soviet union, Sudan, Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Iran etc are few countries where muslim terrorism has its roots and training centres.

Actually It was US who encouraged a lot number of terror organisations in the past against the soviet union. Now since those terror organisations have no other work, they decided to wage a holy war Jihad. No wonder they have also included US has their target, since its the super power.

Only when one little known group fights with a super power could its presnce and importance knwon to the world. AlQaida, Laskare toiba are said to be deadliest criminal gangs which US has recognised.

There are clever countries like Pakistan and others which get free US money by keeping OSama bin laden at home in Pakistan as a insurance cover. The longer it keeps Osama bin laden in its home, the longer it keeps on getting the money of US tax payers.

It is funny for me to know that an estimated 25% of US polulation is below the poverty line, yet the US Government spends an enermous amount of budget for other countries and their needs and on waging war with Iraq and Afghanistan.

Bush is only tring to cope the traumas of what his predecessors have done by financing the terror gangs against soviet union in the past. So there is no use blaming Bush, since the muslim terror organisations, continue to wage Jihad irrelevant who sits in US president chair.

2006-09-23 13:53:30 · answer #6 · answered by donald 2 · 0 0

The "jihad" didn't stir sh!t up in the Middle East, George Bush did. Haven't you watched the news? King George recently announced that Iraq didn't have anything to do with 9/11. Go check it out and get back to us.

2006-09-23 13:33:32 · answer #7 · answered by mickeyg1958 4 · 1 0

President Bush is the Commander in Chief. People don't have to agree with everything he says or does, but people should respect the office if nothing else. I'm really tired of America bashing. I don't see the Brits bashing the queen.

2006-09-23 13:35:04 · answer #8 · answered by hollyltstarfleet 4 · 0 0

Sept 11th. was the greatest failure of our Government in the history of our country. Bush was told in advance they would attack. He was also told they would use Comm. aircraft to attack. Who would you blame if not Bush and his cronies who did nothing.
The loss of life in Iraq is also on Bush's hands. 300,000 civilians and 2670 brave Americans. Bin Laden is in Afghanistan and he has admitted he planned Sept. 11th.. Iraq is in civil war now and will cost working class tax payers $2 trillion. We have a $9 trillion national debt and a $38 billion trade deficit. At no time in the History of our country have we lost more jobs to other countries. Who would you blame?
BTW, there are 1.3 billion who follow Isalm, would you Nuke them all?

2006-09-23 13:39:05 · answer #9 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 0 0

Well too many of the liberal side can't see just what fools they act like or say. Even when we know they have nothing to contribute, heck most of them with the loudest voice don't even vote. I think the stats are 2 in 5 vote at all. Too many are still on parole. I also think many bashes here are not old enough to vote.

2006-09-23 13:35:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Good point. Too many people blame him for everything.

The only things he is directly responsible for are the Iraq war, the poor economy, and continuous personal violations of the Constitution of the United States of America.

The islamic fundamentalist Jyhad would be occurring regardless.

2006-09-23 13:27:23 · answer #11 · answered by special-chemical-x 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers