What happened to that free speech you Democrats are always preaching about?
2006-09-23 13:06:41 · 16 answers · asked by Luekas 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hey, bashing is as bashing does.
As long as one sticks to the facts, bash away, whether Bush or Clinton
2006-09-23 13:09:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Former pres. Clinton had his faults,but the economy was much better,the world ,esp. here in the USA was more peaceful and prosperous place to live. Clinton is no longer president and is now history.(yes Clinton lied about what happened with Monica among ofter problems) but Pres.Bush Jr. is now president and is trying to make up for the mistakes of former Pres.Bush Sr. made in Iraq.,the economy was bad during Bush Sr office also. It is clear that if you weigh the positives vs. the negatives of each president while they were /are in office that Pres.Bush's faults naturally out weigh Clinton's.
2006-09-23 21:02:45 · answer #2 · answered by george g 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I feel we do have the freedom of speech so bash away. However, make sure you bash properly, don't lie or ignore the flawed performance of any president, Clinton or Bush. It just is that Bush is a much more incompetent president.
2006-09-23 22:23:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. Clinton is not an idiot
2. Clinton is not a war monger(read murder)
3. Clinton made his own decisions (wasn't a puppet)
4. The economy was thriving when he ran the joint
5. Clinton was not an idiot.
It amazes me that people got all raving lunatic about Clinton getting a ******** but turn their heads at the thousands of young Americans that die every day due to this administrations incompetence, greed and stupidity, and don't even get me started about the Katrina victims.
2006-09-23 20:24:18 · answer #4 · answered by jerzeme 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush is the President now. And Clinton had his faults. But he was much better.
At least he was able to protect us in 93, and catch and arrest those responsible for the attempt on the WTC.
2006-09-23 20:35:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton lied about a BJ
Bush has been lying since stealing the election and setting up 9-11
10s of 1000s of innocent dead is another big difference...
2006-09-23 20:19:06 · answer #6 · answered by afriendof CLIFFy D 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Let's put the question differently...
Name one thing you disliked about Clinton's presidency, other than his tryst with Monica. Come on... oh, is that all you've got?! No, don't ramble about Al Quaeda - even if true, it comes only in hindsight. I'm saying, WHILE he was president, what policy-focused matter made you hate him as you do? He let gays in the military? Oh please, find something REAL to be upset about.
C'mon, did you have anything in those eight years that you said, at the time, was bad for America? I strongly, strongly doubt it - and don't moan about Bosnia if you're gung-ho about Iraq, either.
2006-09-23 20:17:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
This isn't true, Clinton was a great President. He evan accomplished more than the Bush administration. Check out C-SPAN, great channel.
2006-09-23 20:15:34 · answer #8 · answered by Aaron B 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, you got it wrong. Its the conservatives who are pissing and moaning and calling anybody a traitor for being crtitical of Bush. When Clinton was President, the conservatives were all over him like a cheap suit. And were the democrats calling the conservatives traitors then? I don't think so.
2006-09-23 20:11:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
The same reason that you bash rats but not bunnies and the same reason you bash cockroaches but not honey bees.
2006-09-23 20:27:13 · answer #10 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋