Probably because there is no oil there and the people there all have built in suntans.......
2006-09-23 13:18:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you serious? Are you advocating that the US go to war in Darfur?
Isn't that something! Criticize the republicans for being in Iraq and then criticize us for not being at war in Darfur!
2006-09-23 20:23:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no profit in it, political or otherwise. Helping Sudan would be a great humanitarian thing to do. But it won't secure a region vital to our national intrests, nor will it score points with voters frightened of terrorists from the Middle East.
2006-09-23 20:15:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Skippy 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Do they have anything we can steal like oil or any cultural artifacts we can destroy?? If so, we'll be over there faster than you can say GO BUSH!!
2006-09-23 20:51:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by arianah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We can't, International law. We can support the UN but can not do it alone. We are sending aid, food and volunteers.
I believe!
2006-09-23 20:14:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Darfur doesn't give anyone a single vote. No one cares about that AIDS infested hell hole.
2006-09-23 20:07:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Black Sabbath 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why didn't the first black president Clinton stop the 1 million Rwandans from being killed?
2006-09-23 20:06:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
THEY DON'T HAVE ANY OIL AND ARE VERY POOR NO POINT IN GOING THERE....
2006-09-23 21:14:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by CAR_DEL99 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
But damnocrats don't want war RIGHT! what hypocrites!!!!
2006-09-23 20:14:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
No crude oil.
2006-09-23 20:07:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋