If not who do you think would be a better candidate for the job???
2006-09-23 12:19:39 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I voted for him twice and I am sorry I did. He has destroyed much of the world respect we once enjoyed. One response said "he has done his best", that has not been good enough. The responder is correct about Bush not asking for 911 but he was looking for an excuse to go to war in Iraq and 911 provided it. Wrong place for the wrong reason and we will pay for it for years to come. Too many good men and women have lost their lives over his grudge! I wasted two votes I would not want to say I wasted a third one. NO!
How about Spanky, or goofy - anybody but Bush or another Texan!
2006-09-26 16:53:54 · answer #1 · answered by privateeye4U 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. He's served two terms, can't run again. So no, I wouldn't vote for him.
2. I never voted for him before. Nor did enough people to get him elected. Stole one election with the help of Jeb. The other with the help of Diebold.
3. Anyone alive would be a better candidate.
2006-09-23 12:32:21 · answer #2 · answered by beast 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO!!! I didn't vote for him in the first place NOR do I know anyone who voted for Bush. As far as who would be a better candidate? Any one of my ten year old students could do a better job than he has done!
2006-09-23 12:31:28 · answer #3 · answered by bitto luv 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Excuse me, but Bush can not run again. There is a two term limit.
If there wasn't.....who would be the on Democratic ticket?
Ted Kennedy? a murderer of that young girl.
John Kerry? look what he did in Viet Nam....and it wasn't under orders. Plus he is a village idiot.
Hillary Clinton? Look at all of the legal trouble she has been in the past 15 years. If she can't take care of her own business, how can she take care of the government. Besides, we certainly can't have that adulturer Bill Clinton....who was so busy 'not having sex with that woman' that he missed the whole terrorism infiltration.
I think that is it.
I think I would vote for the Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist.
2006-09-23 12:28:20 · answer #4 · answered by Trollhair 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well though bush may not be the best person to be the president
i think he was the lesser of to evils between him and cheney and him and gore
i dont kno would would be a better candidate but i kno for sur that if i could vote i would never vote for hilliary clinton
2006-09-23 12:27:14 · answer #5 · answered by ~♥ LilPink ♥~ 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would vote for a yellow Labrador retriever in pink spats before I vote for Bush, anyone who has not challenged his inane and corrupt actions while in office, and/or anyone who uses the unindicted mendicant as a reference.
As to who could do a better job, why, there are asylums full of drooling morons, aren't there? Dress one of them up and Cheney will tell them JUST what to do. Just like now.
Sheesh.
2006-09-23 12:22:54 · answer #6 · answered by Grendle 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Um, there is this constitutional amendment dealing with term limits. Unless you're talking about the elder Bush who only served 1 term, "terms up!".
2006-09-23 16:32:02 · answer #7 · answered by johnnyonthespot 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell freaking no. I strongly believe that Hilary Clinton or C. Rice will be better candidates for the job.
2006-09-23 12:28:02 · answer #8 · answered by Ammy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I will continue to vote with the majority of the country and vote AGAINST Bush.
2006-09-23 12:23:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I didn't vote for him the first or the second time. Bubbles the chimp could do a better job. And he's dead.
2006-09-23 12:27:51 · answer #10 · answered by Phoenix Rising 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋