English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It makes me think the black woman who's suing the franchise is telling the truth. (she says they stole her idea from a screenplay or something like that she wrote).

The first movie has the best dialogue, filming, the best ever. And the other two make absolutely no sense! I've never seen a trilogy so bad(except for star wars). :p

If they couldn't do a halfway decent job, why, oh, why, couldn't they leave perfection alone??

2006-09-23 11:51:21 · 10 answers · asked by Morgan 3 in Entertainment & Music Movies

10 answers

That's the curse of trilogies...like what happened with Alien. Alien was good, Aliens was awesome, and then Alien 3 came along and wasn't as great. And I don't even want to talk about 'that other one'

2006-09-23 11:54:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The second one wasn't really bad but the third one was terrible. Luckily Keanu starred in all three of 'm! The first one was an absolute deeeeeeeelight! I've never heard of a black woman suing the franchise by the way.

2006-09-23 19:04:05 · answer #2 · answered by chocolatebunny 5 · 0 0

There was more thought put into the first one, it was a hit but the other two were thrown together and looks a lot like they ran out of ideas and ended up stumbling around in the dark

2006-09-23 19:01:04 · answer #3 · answered by sadistic_bondagelover 4 · 0 0

The 2nd one was ok with great action scenes, the 3rd was total garbage.

But the first was more of a dilemna with concepts that made us think about our lives and how we live, that's why it was an instant classic.

2006-09-23 18:57:54 · answer #4 · answered by WestCoastin4Life 7 · 0 0

ahh come on ! I thought all three matrix were the bomb. Especially the cadillac car & truck chase in the second movie..that was great special effects!

2006-09-23 19:37:03 · answer #5 · answered by kamsmom 5 · 0 0

Actually I didnt think the second one was all that bad. But yes, the 3rd one totally sucked a fatty!!!

2006-09-23 19:02:23 · answer #6 · answered by ziver g 2 · 0 0

The first one was a new concept, the other two were poor imitations.

2006-09-23 18:54:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the first one was so good that anything after it wouldnt measure up to anything much

2006-09-23 18:57:36 · answer #8 · answered by itsme 4 · 0 0

remake and sequels usually are disappointing, why do they make them? for money!

2006-09-23 18:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by worldstiti 7 · 0 0

most sequels suck

2006-09-23 18:59:57 · answer #10 · answered by michael m 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers