English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-23 10:56:26 · 15 answers · asked by notme 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Richard J. - That's called Diverting. Need a dictionary?

2006-09-23 11:16:29 · update #1

15 answers

"How many Dems Lying, Denying, Diverting, and Repeating in unison make something true?"

I'd say there'll never be enough.

What say you, sh!tbird?

2006-09-23 12:21:52 · answer #1 · answered by Walter Ridgeley 5 · 1 0

"I have never caught a conservative lying."


Ohhh Reeaallyy....So what about this.....

Cheney on whether Saddam Hussein/Iraq has Nuclear weapons...


"We believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons."
Vice President Dick Cheney on NBC's Meet the Press, March 16, 2003

and then

"I don't believe anyone that I know in the administration ever said that Iraq had nuclear weapons."
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, at a hearing of the Senate's appropriations subcommittee on defense, May 14, 2003

Then there is this diatribe courtesy of Condoleezza Rice, you gotta read this.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/28/60minutes/main609074.shtml

of course then there is that whole George Bush justifying to the nation the reason for the war in Iraq was because of the weapons of mass destruction and the connection to 9/11. Both of which have been repeatedly PROVEN as lies.

So when you say, you havent caught them lying, did you mean that you werent actually there or that you werent listening? How does that work.

You know, Clinton lied, Bush lies...both were crappy things to do. The difference is one lie was about infidelity, the other has killed thousands of Americans...you tell me what is worse.

2006-09-23 18:36:38 · answer #2 · answered by jemmy 3 · 0 1

Facts are facts. they are neither Republican, Democrat nor a religious denomination. Facts are the plain simple truth. The following are some disturbing facts.
Fact: Bush and his administration used deceptions to plunge us into a seemingly unnececessary and endless war with Iraq.
that is costing billions of dollars and thousands of lives.
Facts: a large percentage of the USA is without healthcare yet Bush has promised health care to any and all Iraq citizens. but mention universal healthcare to our Republican congress and they call it socialized medicine and vote it down. Go figure?
Facts: Bush and the republican congress are destroying the middleclass by giving tax breaks to the very rich, out-souring the good payng jobs to foreign countries voting against minimum wages and making higher education unaffordable for the masses
Only for the rich. Remember our middle class built our great country with their taxes, hard work and creativity. Under the present system the rich is getting richer and the poor is getting poorer.
Facts: Bush and the Republican congress are trying to destroy most of our great social programs such as social security, medicare, etc.
Facts: Bush and the Republican congress are trying to destroy our public schools system with the voucher system.
Facts: Illegal drugs are the biggest problem in our society and little if any federal aid is available to fight them.
Most young men that have been killed in the Iraq war come from poor familys. Decisions made by the Rich do not affect them or there familys. The oil companys are owned by 86% Republicans.
Money has been allocated to rebuild Iraq. While New Orleans lays in ruins.
Have we made the world any safer from terriorists attacks? Or have we created more enemies?
Have they shown themselves to be more of a Christian? Christ like? By passing bills to torture people, murder people.
Give to the rich at the expense of the poor. Deny health care to millions of poor Americans.
Or do they sound more like the Religious Leaders of Jesus day. The ones he condemned.

2006-09-23 18:01:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

That is the domain of dems.. has been going on for many years. They repeat it often enough they actually convince those unable to think for themselves.

2006-09-23 18:15:04 · answer #4 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 1 0

I have never caught a conservative lying.
I have never caught a liberal telling the truth, except when they say they worry about how we treat terrorists.
Did you ever hear Clinton tell the truth about anything? And he was more trustworthy than liberals.

2006-09-23 18:02:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Awww, at least we don't add murdering unborn children and treason to our list.

2006-09-23 18:06:24 · answer #6 · answered by jbbrant1 4 · 1 1

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of
mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President
Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to
seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the
risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons
against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb 18,
1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." -
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution
and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on
suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl
Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction
technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and
palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports
indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to
pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that
will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to President Bus h, Signed by Sen.
Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the peace
and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations. "We have
known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass
destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter
and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore,
Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons
of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen.
Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop
nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also
should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10,
2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN
resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological
weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D,
CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein
has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery
capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam
Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and
will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10,
2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has,
and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if
necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of
mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F.
Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator,
leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so
consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction... So the
threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real" - Sen. John F. Kerry
(D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2006-09-23 18:10:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hee Haw, Hee Haw, Your mouth is moving, but you ain't saying anything

2006-09-23 18:01:48 · answer #8 · answered by rikv77 3 · 1 3

5. Dubya, Dick C., Rummy, Condi, and Turd Blossom.

But it is only true if you are in a red state.

2006-09-23 18:00:06 · answer #9 · answered by imnogeniusbutt 4 · 2 2

Is that more crying I hear from the party represented by the jacka*s.

2006-09-23 17:59:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers