English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Which would yuo say has more emotional value, substance and feeling ??

watching the sun set in a hot country where the silence is golden and all you can hear is the waves of the ocean lapping upon the shore and the water flowing across your body giving you a sense of solitude, harmony, or making love to the person you adore mst in the world and feeling there soft skin curess yours and feeling the intense passion flow through you like a waterfull of emotion ? ? ?

2006-09-23 10:45:47 · 16 answers · asked by English gothic 3 in Science & Mathematics Chemistry

16 answers

SEX by FAR!!!! but why have sex only when you can have the best of both worlds. SEX in NATURE!!! SO......While watching the sun set in a hot country where the silence is golden and all you can hear is the waves of the ocean lapping upon the shore and the water flowing across your body giving you a sense of solitude, harmony, you are making love to the person you adore most in the world and feeling there soft skin curess yours and feeling the intense passion flow through you like a waterfull of emotion. Now that is what I call Making LOVE. Damn I want some.

2006-09-23 10:51:12 · answer #1 · answered by Mo 5 · 0 0

Aren't they the same? Having sex is just as natural as "enjoying nature". If there is any difference between the two, it's that having sex involves sharing...usually (!) while "enjoying nature" is done best alone, arguably.

Having sex on the moonlit beach or on a mountain top is...orgasmic.

2006-09-23 11:19:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because your question is so long I skimmed really than examine it. one in each of my christian pals waited till she changed into married to have sex, at almost the age of 40. This has brought about sexual issues for her because the construct-up and her decrease sex-rigidity with advanced age have left her upset and unable to orgasm. I truly remember on monogamy and do not spread myself round (3 sexual companions in my 40 years of existence), even with the reality that this isn't in accordance to non secular motives yet personal ones that sex is an fairly important and alluring aspect. even with the indisputable fact that, i imagine my pal has verified that waiting all that aspect for sex is fairly unnatural and negative.

2016-11-23 17:50:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

You sound like a writer. I say put the sex in the nature. Perfect.

2006-09-23 10:57:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Both at the same time. Nature sex is fun!

2006-09-23 10:54:41 · answer #5 · answered by noname 5 · 0 0

I have to put my vote in for the sex.

Nature will stay - far longer than I.

We can enjoy nature before...and after...

2006-09-23 10:48:29 · answer #6 · answered by Warrior 7 · 0 0

Errrmmmm..... Just what is *un*-natural about sex?

It seems to me that sex is a very intrinsic part of nature ☺


Doug

2006-09-23 10:50:13 · answer #7 · answered by doug_donaghue 7 · 0 0

how about making love in a solitary tropical island beach at sunset??

2006-09-23 10:49:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I like "door number two" given those choices... but there is no reason not to combine them.

Aloha

2006-09-23 10:48:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

having sex in nature.

2006-09-23 10:55:37 · answer #10 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers