Why can't America accept Homosexuality if its apart of our civil rights?

Answer 1

Americans, since the Puritans have a difficult time knowing that others are having a good time being who themselves....If you're not gay, it's a club to which you can't belong. Americans hate that. If they can't belong , it shouldn't exist. Generations of men have been taunted as "gay" and "fag" for appearing insufficiently manly to their peers. If the "fags" and "queers" gain social and civil acceptance, then all those who withstood the derision of their peers, will have suffered in vain. Who will be the scapegoats for the next generation of adolescent males?

And Christian fundamentalists have grown tired of waiting for Judgment Day, and have assumed responsibilty for judging and sometimes punishing the "sins" of others, in spite of all of Christ's admonitions. These so-called Christians who rail against homosexuality at every turn are as far from the teachings of CHRIST as they can get. Christ is about love and acceptance and forgiveness.

Homosexuality isn't unnatural, it happens to roughly 10 % of us every day. No one wakes up to find "Be queer" penciled on their day planner.

If you believe God is all powerful, then homosexuality is part of His plan. If you believe in the Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, then it isn't the government's business what consenting adults do with eachother in private.

Married "straight" people have huge amounts of tax money subsidizing their "unions". Clerks, courts, judges, justice, mayors...endless reams of paperwork all dedicated to administering the "institution of marriage" Paid for, in part, by people who are not allowed the right to marry...it is the modern equivalent of taxation without representation.

Answer 2

even if homosexuality is a sin or no longer isn't the placement. think I grant you that that's a sin. which could say no longer some thing about even if a authorities of loose human beings has a suitable to bypass guidelines in accordance to portion of the inhabitants's idea of "sin." If, as an instance, Muslims grew to change into maximum folk interior the U. S., they does no longer be justified in forcing women to conceal their hair via the indisputable fact that's a sin to exhibit a lady's hair. The regulation won't be able to decide on the moral code of anybody faith over the different. accordingly, that's a sin to drink alcohol in some Christian church homes, yet can we imprison drunks? that's a sin to commit adultery - can we imprison adulterers? The question is about what the right limits of the regulation are, and conversely, making confident that the regulation is utilized both to all electorate - such as guidelines pertaining to criminal protections. Why are gays and lesbians having parades? because no longer so earlier, sodomy changed into unlawful. because to on the present time, all and various is overwhelmed and killed for being gay. the idea is that the more advantageous publicity human beings ought to gays and lesbians, the more advantageous they're going to understand them, and the more advantageous sympathy they could have for them. the idea is that the more advantageous human beings keep in mind that they understand a gay or a lesbian for my section, the a lot less alien and risky gays and lesbians will look. like it or no longer, the attitude has worked. you do not ought to like their existence-style, yet they nonetheless deserve an analogous rights and protections as all and various else - such as the right to have sex with any consenting human being of their selection. So, certain, it really is about civil rights. it must be about the attractiveness of sin and the moral degradation of society, in case you decide on to look at it that way, yet this does no longer be the first time the regulation has known that it don't have the authority to police the inhabitants in accordance to the morals of No danger with out Jesus. someone ought to have made an analogous arguments about moral objectivity and correct and incorrect with a view to help the Prohibition or to make premarital heterosexual sex unlawful - that would not advise that the state has the right to change a particular faith's idea of morality.

Answer 3

Accepting something, homosexuality or otherwise, is not the same as agreeing with it. I have to accept the fact that homosexuality exists, but I don't have to agree that it's a "good" choice for people to make, nor do I have to teach my children that it's a good lifestyle to follow.

I have several close friends who happen to be gay, including my two mentors who taught me everything I ever needed to know about my industry.

The thing that strikes me as the very most interesting fact about homosexuality? Overwhelmingly, better than 90% of the homosexual/lesbian was sexually abused as a child, which automatically makes the authenticity of the "gay lifestyle choice" suspect because it started out as an illegitimate, illegal "relationship" to start with.

Answer 4

The premise of your question is wrong. If you read the Constitution and the amendments, you will not find homosexuality listed as a right anywhere.
People in America do not accept homosexual behavior because it is an aberration. Meaning: it ain't natural. Some religions consider it a sin.
Americans should not accept homosexual behavior. It should be condemned. You are trying to legitimize what is abnormal behavior.

Answer 5

What do you mean is part of our civil rights??? No way jose! The civil rights movement is movement by and for BLACKS! ,It is used nowadays for all the 'injustices 'commited on the so called same sex marriage, boloney!, especially male homosexuality is horrendous!It is wrong, human bodies have functions and the anus if for waste disposal! It is a reason why we are male and females, Iam in earnest about this as children who have ben expose to perverts [straight and not ,and I use the word straight here with caution as if a man is straight ,there is no reason why he should force himself on young boys! Our human bodies compliment each other as opposites, man and woman. Period. It is not that must be accepted or not, is amoral.

Answer 6

It isn't part of our civil rights nor is it part of the homosexual community to be accepted by others. I don't know where you got that idea! However, I don't see why people can't accept most of them as being good, law-abiding people like most other people.

Answer 7

Sexuality is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.
Sexuality should be kept in the privacy of your own home.
What is protected is things such as freedom of religion and
people of a different sex, creed , of color.
If you want to be gay that is fine. That is your choice ,but do not in anyway think I HAVE to except it.
Let me ask you when was the last time you went and filled out an
application for employment or anything else's and they asked you
if you were gay. Not Lately, HUH? The reason you are being discriminated against it because of your actions,personality, and manner. So get over yourself.
O yes why don't gays stop discriminating against us by calling us
closed minded Christians. You guys can't follow the Constitution yourselves and respect my freedom of religion so why should we
respect your imaginary gay civial rights?

Answer 8

All people don't feel the same way about everything, but as long as they respect other lifestyles and opinions who cares. If a person violates someones civil rights they should be punished

Answer 9

Our civil rights don't mention anything about homosexuality, though it does say that people have free will and total control over anything they do, including if they want to be gay or not.

Answer 10

The answer is that homosexuality is NOT part of your civil rights.