2006-09-23 08:38:01 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Saddam Hussein is pure, self-intrested evil.
Bin Laden is not evil. He's a zealot. He's a true believer in a hateful, viloent ideology.
Bush is a zealot too, though his ideology is just a teensy bit nicer than Bin Laden's.
So I'd have to say of the three Bush is the best (not better, that's only for comparing TWO choices) man. But given how evil Saddam is and how twisted Bin Laden is, that's not saying much.
2006-09-23 08:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by Skippy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Yes, Bush is a better man than bin Laden, Saddam, Clinton, Carter, Kerry, and Gore"
Can I get a big....WoW....I'll give you Bush is better than Bin Laden & Saddam, however it's a pretty close race. But before you start Clinton bashing, do your research. Clinton was actually incredibly more effective as a president fighting terrorists. All Bush has been effective at was starting an endless war that is just provoking more terrorist attacks.
2006-09-23 08:51:41 · answer #2 · answered by jemmy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No matter what way you look at it, Bush is definitely in last place. I think the movie Fahrenheit 911 should be a required movie for all Americans, just like taking REAL American History classes....not the watered-down nursery school version they teach in most schools across the United States. If you've seen that movie, there is no way you can say Bush is a better man than Bin-laden or Hussein.
2006-09-23 08:49:22 · answer #3 · answered by carpediem3000 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
President Bush is class personified compared to the two other fools
you mention
if I was gonna group people together I would put
Hitler,Mussolini,Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein = birds of a feather
2006-09-23 08:44:50 · answer #4 · answered by tanner_1122 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
"Terrorist attacks got here about everywhere after 9/11 yet none ever got here about on domicile soil." the position have you ever been before 9/11? "isn't this an excellent fulfillment? he has helped unify international places hostile to terrorism and has higher your nationwide protection hostile to overseas international places" in reality some international places supported his "conflict", like uk (Blair), Spain (Aznar), Italy (Berlusconi) "he's a lot more advantageous acceptable than the present president. considering Obama took over Somali pirates now administration the Gulf of Aden" they are no more advantageous acceptable than one yet another. both gave money to corporations who messed it up. Pirates are the effect of Dubya's conflict company.
2016-11-23 17:37:50 · answer #5 · answered by aziz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
G W Bush
2006-09-23 08:57:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anthony M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Bush is a better man than bin Laden, Saddam, Clinton, Carter, Kerry, and Gore.
In fact, he's better than all of them put together.
2006-09-23 08:41:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Well, I like President Bush, and I want to complement you on getting his name spelled right. You kind of messed up on the others.
2006-09-23 08:44:49 · answer #8 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I can't beleive some of these answers .....american idiots.
You president is working his *** for you against these fascist bastards and even if he may have made mistakes or wrong choices this does not condem him the same way we condem these other hateful fuks.....shame on you....anthony in your picture you are holding your american flag......patriotic my ***.
I'm canadian BTW and I love and appreciate everything that our countrys, our leaders, and our militarys are doing for us.
move to iraq or something if you want to live under their rule.
2006-09-23 09:14:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
George Bush because he takes care of his family and the lifes of his people. Bin Laden kills them while Saddam has executed so many of his own countrymen, the Kurds.
2006-09-23 08:40:56 · answer #10 · answered by Scouser7674 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋