I have some questions about 9/11..Please Help?

Question

Who flew the planes if 9 hijackers turned up alive?
How did a plane hit the pentagon if its over 100' long and only made a 16' hole?
Why were the engines of the plane missing if they are made of steel and titnium with a combined weight of 12 tons, and stell and titnium has a melting point of 2700F, with the fire less then 1400F
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in AA put contracts on 9-10-01
Why was all the evidence sold to china before anybody can invegigate?
How did the cell phones work so well at such a high attitude?
Why was william rodreiez, a janitor in the building, offered millions of dallors to shut up, and to not tell people he saw bombs explosing in the basement?
Why did the towers fall at the speed of gravity?
Why did the firefighters see bombs going off in the building before they got out?
Why did Larry Silverstein admit Blowing up WTC7?

Why am I out of room?

Answer 1

I'm tired of the morons going off about this...

Obviously, reasonable intelligent answers don't sink through. In that regard I found the perfect link to debunk this lunacy. Thank you Maddox for a succint analysis.

If for some reason you want to try an informed overview try Popular Mechanics;
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
and for a point by point dissection of "Loose Change" try;
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html


Neither are short, and both require critical thinking. Not for the MTV generation, if you find it too dense just check out http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons for a more succinct answer.

Source(s):

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

Answer 2

Demolition of WTC 7! It is possible that act is done to claim the full insurance money by Larry Silverstein as complete destruction of whole WTC project buildings otherwise the courts and insurances companies will find a way to pay less. Just a possiblity untill Final reports from experts.

The two dozen insurers held that it was one incident. If it were considered to be a single incident, the payout would be $3.55 billion and if it were two incidents, it would be $7.1 billion. Silverstein sued the insurers.
In total, Silverstein was awarded nearly $5 billion in insurance money following the destruction of the Twin Towers [9]. He plans to use some or all of the settlement to rebuild.

Answer 3

I just do not understand why a full investigation by a credible third party was not done! Why is there not a complete unbiased report showing full proof not just hearsay and bits and peaces of evidence that 9/11 was committed by the people whom they are saying are responsible. I mean in this day and age this should not be too difficult! There should be evidence without a shadow of a doubt on people who committed 9/11 since so many have been killed and continue to in its' name.

Answer 4

There were no planes and no hijackers - see below.
It was a missile that hit the pentagon.
No plane, therefore no engines.
Thermite was used in the controlled demolition.
The perpetrators knew before hand and wanted to make money on the stock exchange.
Evidence sols as part of the cover-up.
No planes, no passengers, no cell phones.
William Rodriguez offered money as part of cover-up
Towers fell at speed of gravity because all controlled demolitions fall that way.
The firefighters saw reality
Larry Silverstein made a mistake.

Manufactured terrorism
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html

No-planes important
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/matters.html

Answer 5

You sure did ask a lot of questions, but you failed to let us know where you got all the information. I have read hundreds of newspaper articles on the subject. I regularly read two weekly news magazines. Nothing about all the BS in your question.
Are you sure that you're not being used by some organization trying to discredit the country, or are you intentionally doing that yourself ?

Answer 6

People are laughing at you.

If you are going to try to create a new 9/11 conspiracy, you better get help.
You have just listed about a dozen transparent lies that even a small child wouldn't believe.

How embarrassing for you. Do your homework.

Answer 7

Put down the crack pipe and step away from the computer!
Around the corner from your house are some men in white suits witha big butterfly net.

Have you ever flown on a airplane before? Have you ever left your cell phone on by accident and it rang? Probally not. They don't let you out very often do they?

Answer 8

Read this: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html

there is an mp3 file you can listen, also, at this URL

Every question you ask is wrong, having almost nothing to do with the actual facts.

Which is easier to believe, that some names were misspelled and identities were confused or that some vast conspiracy was planned and executed without ever being revealed?

Answer 9

wow!

TRY THIS LINK........ shhhh..its a secret.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm

Ive been keeping it

for a rainy day.
---------

Anthony M: the pop mechanics guys debated the loose change guys and they (Pop Mech)couldn't answer anything other than with the mainstream PC answers. But nothing to back it up scientifically.

Answer 10

You been standing on a Grassy Knoll to long