I agree with you on that one! half of the calls are complete nonsence! they have obviously got their fav teams so they are going to be biast! half of them are blind and need to go to specsavers!
2006-09-23 22:35:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by nuba1_defenda_emma! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
why dont you try and be a ref and see how hard it is..its so easy to critizise a ref esp when he only has 1 look at an offence or penalties..do you want to spoil football by stop, starting a game and look at a camera for 1 min every time a foul is commited get a grip it ,plain and simple that you have never played football in your life why dont you get off yr sofa and try it out,......look at how boring a game gridiron is because they stop and start the game
2006-09-23 15:02:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by rusty red 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I disagree with you mate. The refs are under review just like the players.
As for bringing in cameras, who is going to be in charge of the camera decision? More than likely another 2 refs.
This would allow for even more bungs.
2006-09-23 14:44:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ne Obliviscaris 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
if they start using tv replays the game will drag on and on with teams moaning for replays for corners throws in this that and the other
Fergie would be forever checking his watch.
refs are human and see it once they dont have camera at every angle before they call it bet you never praise a ref when he spots something you miss
2006-09-23 14:44:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by ianjohnpaul 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would be a great help if footballers just concentrated on playing football and cut out the cheating and trying to get people sent off.
2006-09-23 15:08:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by migelito 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
because players have 1 rules and regulations and refs have another.
They are supposed to be professionals thats why they get paid for it but they get away with murder where as a player gets suspended, wages deducted etc. for offences not commited but imagined by refs. look at mr poll with his 3 yellow cards hahahahahahahaha
2006-09-23 16:33:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by jaybgib 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you feel you can do a better job then go ahead and do it. I'm sure your local FA would be delighted to hear from someone who has such passion for the game.
2006-09-23 16:26:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sonny Walkman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its better to have a referee so we can at least keep sports witouht any technology and more human, like the referee's vision, that's how life is
2006-09-23 16:44:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by bluekiss_44 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
While there have been some poor descisions lately,
I think today both pens were correctly given.
Didn't see Neville complaining too much, which is a first,
so that tells it's own story.
2006-09-23 14:45:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by lesliegibbon 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
cos they think they are the best but there only refs. There are 22 people on the pitch, why don't they just take him!
2006-09-23 15:03:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋