Are you a "FIREBRAND"?
*One that creates unrest or strife (as in aggressively promoting a cause) : agitator
By the early 14th century, "firebrand" was also being used for one doomed to burn in hell, and by 1382, English writers were using it for anyone who kindled mischief or inflamed passions.
2006-09-23 05:56:49 · 14 answers · asked by Schizo 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Well, depends on the new definition, or the 14 century definition. I can't say I cause too much unrest or strife (well, maybe for some). But doomed to burn in hell.....possibly. No, likely. Kindled mischief? Maybe. Inflame passions? Definitely. Ok, you got me.....I'm a f*ucking FIREBRAND. If I wasn't, wouldn't I be a bit boring???
2006-09-27 02:24:51 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Haven't heard this word before but I guess I would have to say yes since I do fight for anything I believe in strongly but I'm not an agitator, but I do feel we should fight for things we believe in so let them call us anything they want.
2006-09-23 13:01:01 · answer #2 · answered by ncgirl 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope but that depends on different points of views...
2006-09-23 12:58:47 · answer #3 · answered by e_spehr_99 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Typically I'm not, unless I'm low on sleep.
2006-09-23 13:13:31 · answer #4 · answered by SkiGirl04 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, i'm just indifferent... or peaceful most of the times.
2006-09-23 13:00:33 · answer #5 · answered by misery 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I am.
Do you dabble in the devil's dandruff?
2006-09-23 13:00:09 · answer #6 · answered by anonymous 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, it's cool to be a tank runner these days, lmao
2006-09-23 12:59:14 · answer #7 · answered by Franky Tank Runner 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope
2006-09-23 15:49:06 · answer #8 · answered by Jubei 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I am a peacemaker. Are you?
2006-09-23 12:58:25 · answer #9 · answered by Dillydally 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-09-23 21:00:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anry 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋