Why are we not being shown the videos showing what hit the Pentagon?

Question

This entire argument could be put to rest instantly if they would just stop hiding everything and show us the video! There were 5 video cameras pointing at the impact side of the Pentagon. All 5 videos were confiscated, and only 5 frames of one of them were released, and those do not show what it was that hit the Pentagon. The 3 missing frames would show exactly what is was.

I think that this is the most important way to find out whether it was an inside job or not. If it really was a passenger airplane, we would all know that it was terrorists (and that a miracle happened to make the entire plane fit into a 16 foot hole and disappear for the first time in aviation history...but this is beside the point).

Let's see the videos!

We are talking about the Pentagon here, not the twin towers. Everyone saw that, and there is simply no good, clear video footage of the planes themselves to see whether they had windows or pos underneath or whatever. I think that the Pentaon one can concretely show once and for all whether it was terrorists from Saudi Arabia or our government. All that is needed is those videos.

"9/11 in plane sight" and Loose Change bring up some good points...they can both be viewed on Google Video. There are a bunch of other videosfrom both viewpoints on the subject, but the fact is, there was a 16 foot hole supposedly created by a Boeing 767, which is 44 feet tall, 23 ffet wide (fuselage) with a wingspan of 120 feet and two 6 ton steel and titanium engines that at least one of which would have hit the wall before the rest of the wing, yet where the engine would have impacted at over 500 mph there was no damage...even the windows were intact.

Seems a bit fishy, but who knows? Maybe it did happen. The only way to know for sure is to see the missing frames of the one video, and the entire other 4 videos that captured the event.

By the way, a Tomahawk cruise missile makes a hole in a building 16 in diameter.

I am referring to the security video that they released 5 frames from that would show the plane (if it was one) hitting. The eyewitnesses' reports all vary. Some say they saw a helicopter hovering, some say they saw a small cessna, etc. Every single thing out there is open to debate because there are so many conflicting reports.

Those 5 videos could show what really happened. If the videos show that a plane really hit, there would be no more conpiracy to talk about...well, not much. It wouldn't explain everything, but would give us a good idea.

it would only take a few frames from each to prove the whole thing.

Why do people not want to see the videos?

Are you afraid of what you will see?

Answer 1

Good Question, I feel they show the towers over and over, why not the Pentagon? I sure don't have an answer to that question. But I can understand where you are coming from. Seems like there is more to it then the Government wants us to know. But hey that is life huh, we have our lives open to them. Good Question, don't get many of those on here anymore.

Answer 2

"This entire argument could be put to rest instantly if they would just stop hiding everything and show us the video!"

so you believe the rest is not a conspiracy but this one point is holding your decision back . how about all the witnesses that saw the plane hit the pentagon , do you think the government paid them to lie . What about all the people in the military and faa that tracked the plane to the pentagon , do you believe all these people were in on it to . all the evidence is there is you really want the truth , and it sounds like you do . some people regardless of facts will always believe this is a conspiracy . I don't know why they wouldn't show the hotel video , maybe the plane hit people before it hit the pentagon and it is to gruesome and disrespectfull to the family's , maybe that view you see people in the windows of the plane which would be to hard on the family's . If this was truly a conmspiracy the hotel employees did see the video and then had a talk with the cia , unless they had a men in black mind eraser those people would leak the information , wouldn't you

Answer 3

I don't know about now, but in the 70's the only camera's outside the Pentagon were in the parking area's. They have shown clips from two of the camera's and you can see in a frame by frame view, the wingtip flash by prior to impact. NOW, inside is a different story because they have really super secret camera system. Besides, if they have more outside cameras, maybe they dont want other countries to know how many, and what views these cameras cover. They have to have some secrets that they dont want flashed across the evening news.

Use a little common sense, they have NEVER given out direct information from any black box from any crash that has ever happened. They give a transcript of the cockpit recording, and in one instance, allowed family to hear a few seconds of it. The fact that four different airplanes are missing, and there are four recorded impacts of said airplanes, should tell you that yes, two hit the WTC, one hit the Pentagon and one in Shanks-ville Pa.

The so called " inside job or conspiracy theory" don't hold water. Security cameras at the airport shows several of the terrorists prior to boarding their assigned flights.

There have been many conspiracy theories about everything from Pearl Harbor, to Roswell, and to JFK, and none have been proved. It is strictly people " voicing their thoughts and ideas" but don't have anything to back it up.

Answer 4

@bigmike... there were cameras on a hotel and a fuel station pointig directly to were the "757" hit the Pentagon, this tapes have been imediatly confiscated by FBI agents.
I'm from Europe and a lot of people here think that there is a big cover up of your government.
There were a lot of miracles on 911. Everythink pulverized - the planes, the towers....
There would be a lot lesser conspiracy theories when the american government and the CIA would answer some questions. But they don't. Because they can't?!??

Answer 5

The truth is that it really was a jumbo jet. The same technique used to fool you into thinking that the WTC 7 was imploded based on the "fact" that it had little to no damage when it fell was used on you to trick you into thinking that there is no way a jumbo jet could fit into the tiny hole that they keep showing you - They are not showing you all the angles, all the pictures of the damage. In fact they are withholding thosse picture to keep their lie alive. Just like the fact that WTC 7 was 25% collapsed on the south side and burning out of control for many hours was withheld from you, so is the fact that there are photos around that show the true face of the pentagon from the correct angles that show that a jumbo jet could fit. This is nothing new. There have been those that have "Proven" that Lee Harvey Oswald could not have been the lone shooter, and later some very smart people used 3D models to show that all the rounds did in fact all come from one point.

Answer 6

I couldn't agree with you more, just show us the videos

Also:

It 's over five years since the tragic events of 9/11/01 unfolded, and still the general public has seen no physical evidence that should have been collected at each of the four crash sites, (a routine requirement during mandatory investigations of each and every major aircraft crash.)

United Airlines Flight 93

This flight was reported by the federal government to be a Boeing 757 aircraft, registration number N591UA, carrying 45 persons, including four Arab hijackers who had taken control of the aircraft, crashing the plane in a Pennsylvania farm field.

Aerial photos of the alleged crash site were made available to the general public. They show a significant hole in the ground, but private investigators were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash site. If an aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would have literally hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within the hole that would have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the precise tail-number or identity of the aircraft. However, the government has not produced any hard evidence that would prove beyond a doubt that the specifically alleged aircraft crashed at that site. On the contrary, it has been reported that the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in operation.

American Airlines Flight 11

This flight was reported by the government to be a Boeing 767, registration number N334AA, carrying 92 people, including five Arabs who had hijacked the plane. This plane was reported to have crashed into the north tower of the WTC complex of buildings.

Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if only a few of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been collected to positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear or just one engine would have been easy to find and identify.

United Airlines Flight 175

This flight was reported to be a Boeing 767, registration number N612UA, carrying 65 people, including the crew and five hijackers. It reportedly flew into the south tower of the WTC.

Once more, the government has yet to produce one serially controlled part from the crash site that would have dispelled any questions as to the identity of the specific airplane.

American Airlines Flight 77

This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number N644AA, carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five hijackers. This aircraft, with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have crashed into the Pentagon, leaving an entry hole no more than 65 feet wide.

Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within 15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry. There was apparently some aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no attempt was made to produce serial numbers or to identify the specific parts found. Some of the equipment removed from the building was actually hidden from public view.

Conclusion

The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, (including serial numbers) plus security videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each tragic episode.

Answer 7

i agree 100%. i watched a thing on TV where it was reported that a Boeing 747 supposedly hit the pentagon, however the hole in the pentagon was not even one third the size of a Boeing 747. so i think that either a plane didn't hit it, or if it did, a Boeing may have clipped it with a wing then disappeared. i think it was an inside job. there is no doubt a plane hit the towers, it was all caught on video, but there has never been anything released about the pentagon. who knows. the public just took the governments word for it, but we really have no idea what happened.

Answer 8

Until I see footage of a plane actually hitting the bulding then I'm just going to assume that a plane did not hit the building.

Answer 9

Wow. I didn't know there was any controversy about what hit the Pentagon, but it sounds fascinating. There is definitely more to the story of both the WTC and Pentagon attacks than we know.

Could you please post some specific sources for this info here on your question? I don't have TV. Are there books or articles I could read?

Do you think the explosion at the Pentagon was part of a set-up where United 93 was supposed to crash and hide the evidence?

Answer 10

I saw a video on TV that showed a plane hitting the Pentagon. It was on some major news outlet because I don't watch obscure stuff. I don't see how you could miss it.