English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you had to choose one person of the 3 choices to eat dinner with who would it be?

1. A Italian Mobster that robs from the rich, and gives to the rich?

2. A multimillionaire televangelist that robs from the poor and gives to his rich(himself)?

3. Or Newt Gingrich-that wants tax cuts for the supposedly oppressed rich, and wants to cut social programs for the poor, and reopen orphanges?

PS-I'd choose the Italian Mobster-EVEN THOUGH THE MOB DOES NOT EXIST. The Italian food would be good, and the evening would be entertaining. He'd rob me, but at least I'd know it.

The televangelist would rob me while my back is turned, and Newt would eat all my food!

2006-09-23 04:12:28 · 25 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government Politics

You only get 3 choices. But if you wanna starve....then fine!

2006-09-23 04:19:44 · update #1

25 answers

Yes, Newt is a greedy sucker.

I would choose the mobster, because I grew up in South Philadelphia and many an Italian grandmother fed me wonderful food as I was growing up, and I sat at the table and listened to many a mobster and clan sing, laugh, and talk up a storm in Italian, English, and pidgen combination of the two.

2006-09-23 04:18:15 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 1 0

I have eaten with the Mob and a Tele-evangelist. That only leaves Newt.

He might be interesting in a anthropological sort of way. But I would keep an eye on my wife. Newt has always had problems with his loose zipper.

2006-09-23 04:45:29 · answer #2 · answered by Skull&Bones 2 · 0 0

Since those are the choices I will pick one, I would have to say the mob. Very inter interesting history there and colorful expressions I'm sure but after they shared all this with you would you be sleeping with the fishes. Newt ZZZZZZZZZ.Evangelist's,no free meal is worth sitting with that kind of hypocrisy.

2006-09-23 04:23:52 · answer #3 · answered by razeumright 3 · 1 0

Newt Gingrich

2006-09-23 04:15:19 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 0 2

Since they're all crooks, I'd go with the one that was the most honest and probably had the best stories - the Mobster.

2006-09-23 04:39:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd choose Gingrich. Although I don't agree with his politics, it would make for an interesting conversation. Re: The Mob, unfortunately for us, it does still exist, but RICO laws has certainly weakened it.

2006-09-23 04:15:44 · answer #6 · answered by kobacker59 6 · 0 0

If I was going to forced to have dinner with one of them, I guess that I would choose the mobster.

2006-09-23 04:16:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The mobster - there might be honour among thieves, there certainly isnt among politicians and godmongers

2006-09-23 04:16:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Why i should eat with any of the 3 in the question. God has given me the food and let me eat that food with HIM and with those respect Him.

2006-09-23 04:18:55 · answer #9 · answered by luckey 1 · 0 1

If I had to choose between the three? I'd starve myself.

2006-09-23 04:15:27 · answer #10 · answered by Tequila_Rose 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers