English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-23 03:44:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

If you still believe this lie and how Bush admin. mislead you into believing this,
stop watching faux news.

It is a lie. Repeat: get it out of your head , it is a lie that Iraq had anything to do at all with 9/11.....

2006-09-23 03:47:15 · update #1

12 answers

I just love how some of them, say that no one ever believed that. Then others say that it is true and you are trying to lie to them. LOL

2006-09-23 03:51:39 · answer #1 · answered by a4140145 4 · 1 0

Totally! Fox SUCKS! HANNITY SUCKS EVEN MORE! And I belive all the republicans are of this view that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 although a report was published last week where it said Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. So once again, Bush had been proven wrong.

2006-09-23 10:51:06 · answer #2 · answered by rumman 2 · 0 1

Sad to say it's about 50 percent of them. I just had one tell me "they were of like kind". In "Like kind" meaning of Arab decent. This tells all about Republicans. They seem to be willing to use nukes and kill all 1.3 billion who follow Isalm in the world, hoping that one will be Bin Laden. BTW, Bin Laden has been reported dead from Typhoid.

2006-09-23 10:49:03 · answer #3 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 1 0

all of them do .i was watching cspan and they keep calling in crying about we were attacked on 911, well we were but not by iraq.

2006-09-23 11:33:28 · answer #4 · answered by sasuke 4 · 0 0

If FDR would have thought like Bush, he would have attacked Thailand when japan bombed Pearl harbor

2006-09-23 10:47:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

It never did. Who ever said it did?

http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html

2006-09-23 10:45:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Never thought that. I think that's one of those media driven myths, that Dems like to quote.

2006-09-23 10:46:24 · answer #7 · answered by MEL T 7 · 2 1

Excellent questions. Keep up the excellent work Jane. We're all behind you.

2006-09-23 10:46:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I never knew any who did even tho liberals accused them of it. Saddam was however firmly linked to terror support.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons
of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President
Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear.We want to
seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." -
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the
risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons
against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." - Madeline Albright, Feb
18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." -
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution
and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on
suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs." - Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens.
Carl Levin (D-MI), Tom Daschle (D-SD), John Kerry ( D - MA), and others Oct. 9,1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction
technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and
palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs.
Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may
be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery
systems and is doubtless using the cover of an illicit missile program to develop
longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." - Letter to
President Bus h, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and threat to the
peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter
and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore,
Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that
Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he
has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare
capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen.
Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop
nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We
also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10,
2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant
UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological
weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" - Rep. Henry Waxman (D,
CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein
has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery
capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked,
Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical
warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D,
NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein
has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and
storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-if
necessary-to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons
of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." - Sen. John F.
Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous
dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat
because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating
America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real"
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

2006-09-23 10:48:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

better watch it you might get reported for a anti-repug question.....

2006-09-23 10:46:38 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers