English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm in love with Margaret Thatcher.

2006-09-22 23:37:08 · 28 answers · asked by KU 4 in Politics & Government Government

God bless Maggie T.

2006-09-22 23:43:43 · update #1

28 answers

Very good point. She wouldn't be giving Bush a rim job under the table, she'd have had Osama by the balls a long time ago..

2006-09-22 23:41:24 · answer #1 · answered by sticky 7 · 6 2

No, not at all, it was she that gave us the Muslim council, effectively their own parliament.
I am equally sure that her extreme views would have caused even more trouble.
She was also the figurehead that fronted the most awful government this country ever had, because of her we have no mining, no shipbuilding, no steel etc etc...
This was a nice country to live in pre-Thatcher, now the education system and the health service etc..etc..will never recover from the damage she caused.
Everything privatised, so that her rich tory chums could get even richer. She sold the country and all it possesed to the lowest bidder. Council estates in their entirety knocked out to tory boys and girls at a pittance, even graveyards in London sold for next to nought.
She dragged us kicking and screaming back to the 19th century. Everything we and our fathers fought for...gone.
Her very name disgusts me.

2006-09-23 00:15:52 · answer #2 · answered by Robert Abuse 7 · 0 2

Can't you lot see sense?
Stop mouthing off about Muslims and ask yourself why they are suddenly in the limelight.
Please don't say 9-11.
Hitler used his fantastically loyal Jewish community to distract the people in his lust for power.
Look around and find the reason for it?
Please don't say Bush either.
One minute he is an idiot and the next he is a World player according to the Answers crowd.

Somewhere there are dark forces at work and I don't mean the devil.

2006-09-23 00:04:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes, I think so. "A stitch in time saves nine". So they say. We are now suffering from years of appeasement, and during that time, the problem got bigger. They, and I mean mainly this Government together with their Left Wing buddies, think that talking and 'Multicultualism' is the answer, and they still think this. Meanwhile, our enemy gets bolder and stronger by the day. Many of us saw this coming years ago.

2006-09-23 03:28:45 · answer #4 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0 0

She didn't beat the PIRA, INLA et al.

Why would you think she would be any more successful against other terrorists?

She destroyed the Unions, yes, but then they weren't terrorists they were democratic instruments of the working class put in place to protect their work interests.

Think before you post.

2006-09-23 02:07:44 · answer #5 · answered by The Pirate Captain 3 · 1 0

I'm not sure, but I know one thing. She would never have allowed Ronnie Ragan to control her and she would have finished the Iraq conflict, the first time around. She would never have allowed her troops to be undermanned and under equiped in battle.

I'm no war monger, but their our boy's out there!

That said she completely messed up our services here, Rail, NHS, Schools, Etc. Bad call, Magg's Baby Girl!!

2006-09-22 23:51:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Yep, well we wouldn't have had terrorists in the first place cos she would've scared them all away! Actually, we wouldn't have any of these problems if she were still here ... bring back Thatcher!

2006-09-23 00:17:27 · answer #7 · answered by floppity 7 · 2 1

She would have talked the Americans out of invading Iraq. At least kept them to bombing installations.
Not sure how anything else could have been done different given world politics.
We may still need someone like her though. Here's hoping we don't, but ready if we do.
She would certainly have kicked Bolton's *** up and down the UN corridors until Bush would have to withdraw him in embarrassment, and done the same to Wolfowitz.

(PS. Yahoo spell-check suggested 'halfwits' for 'Wolfowitz'. See they get it right sometimes.)

2006-09-22 23:55:54 · answer #8 · answered by Simon D 5 · 1 3

Too right - and how nice to see such a lot of sensible answers all in the same place!

2006-09-23 00:12:04 · answer #9 · answered by Dover Soles 6 · 1 0

**** Margaret Thatcher.

2006-09-22 23:57:42 · answer #10 · answered by Saood 2 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers