I have a few questions on 9/11?

Question

Why are 9 hijackers still alive?
How did a 100' long plane only manage to make a 16' hole at the pentagon?
How did 12Tons of steel and titaium vaparorize at the pentagon but not the wtc, especally when the melting point of steel/ititium is 2700F?
Why was there a 1200% Increase in put options linking to the CIA on 9-10-01, on AA stock?
Why was thermite dripping from the towers, How did it get there?
Why was Bin Laden Writing with his right hand in the video, If he is left-handed?
Why did Larry silverstein admit domilioning WTC7 when on tv?
Why was William Rodriez Bribed Millions of dallors from the US GOVT and told to shut up, and refused the money, the govt tried to kill him?

Why, am I out of room?

Answer 1

Can you say C O N S P I R A C Y :)

Answer 2

Sigh...Here we go again...

This has been beaten to death, so I'll just focus on the three claims above that perfectly outline two of the most common failings of conspiracy chasers.

1) Accepting Supposition over Physical Fact
The Pentagon is four stories high plus a foundation...Any photo of the 9/11 damage clearly shows the "hole" is at least as wide as the building is high. Even if I'd never seen the building in person, I'd know that it was more than 16 feet high and, therefore, the hole was more than 16 feet wide.

2) Distorting Hand-me-Down Facts:
Remember the old "telephone" game from grade school? The game starts with one kid whispering something like "Jimmy got a new bike for Christmas" to another, who then must repeat what he heard to another kid, who repeats it to another kid and so on. By the time a dozen or so kids pass it along, the phrase has morphed into something like "Jimmy was killed by a Christian on a bike."

The "Thermite" story started when a BYU professor, based entirely on what he saw on television, made the comment that the WTC collapse didn't seem consistent with collision and fire damage. He said something to the effect of "for the support beams to come down, a cutting agent like thermite would have to have been used."

The story got reported on several fringe media sites under headlines which progressed as follows:

"Professor says Thermite probably used at WTC."
Which then became "Evidence of Thermite Use at WTC"
Which then became "Evidence of Thermite at WTC"
Which then became "Thermite Found at WTC"

Similarly, the "Larry Silverstein ordered the demolition of WTC7" is based entirely on a video in which he "confesses" that he ordered the building to be "pulled down."

If you watch the video, however, even the one's carefully edited by those trying to prove his "confession," what he says is this:

The FDNY captain contacted Silverstein and told him that the fire burning uncontrolled within WTC7 could not be contained. He felt that the structure was becoming unstable and feared for the safety of his firefighters. He suggested that his men be "pulled out" so that they did not suffer the same fate as those already killed inside WTC1 and 2. Silverstein said he agreed with the decision to "pull" and told the FDNY captain that the firefighters should be "pulled."

Still, conspiracy chasers isolated on a single word--"pull"--and built their case around from there.

Some people will believe whatever they are told so long as it supports their view of the world, and the shout of "Open your minds!" echoes from both sides of the Conspiracy issue. Do I believe everything the government tells me? No. I simply look at both sides objectively and decide which argument is better supported. There are several hundred outlets pushing 9/11 conspiracy theories, but they all revolve around the same six or seven key "proofs."

To date, I have seen none that are any more credible than the already disproven "Pentagon Missile" "Thermite" and "Silverstein" claims.

Keep believing what you believe, but I can sleep at night knowing that my beliefs are supported by facts from multiple, legitimate sources (including some friends who were near the Pentagon on 9/11 and others who were among the first responders at the WTC).

Answer 3

You are out of room, because there isn't enough space within10 questions to ask as many questions as would be necessary to really discuss this 9/11 issue. Most people would rather people throw their hands up in the air and say, "Stop creating conspiracy theories." What conspiracy? Isn't all the evidence pretty obvious?

Answer 4

Adolf Hitler said two things that you should be aware of

1) "What luck for leaders that men don't think"
2) "The bigger the lie the more likely it is to be believed"

It is also of interest to me that he was not promoted past cpl because his commanding officer said he showed no leadership ability .

As for the questions you have I am not going to try to address them because you already know the answers.

So I will ask a few - if the government of the US and or those who were in direct cooperation with then is capable of what you see in the middle of New York what is next?

If they had one more attack what would the outcome be? What would it take to justify Bush staying on as President? A terror attack on the candidates on or just before election day?
What would it take to justify a nuclear assault on Iran ? A terror attack on any particular city in the US ?

What would it take to justify complete marshal law ?

If the ends jutify the means what would those who orginised 9/11 have gotten out of it and what would they get out of yet another attack ?

Are you safe for suggesting such things? Will you be in the near future ?

Bush has almost blatantly said those who perpetuate these conspiracy theories are giving aid to terrorists - How long before your opinion is seen as active disent and then a threat to the security of the United States of America .
If arrested right now on a security ticket (as they are called in Canada) who would question and if they did who would they ask and would they answer - ? No , no they would not they would accept you were guilty and that you are a brain washed thug out to hurt America and it would be bye bye and that would be the end of it.

If thats the way it is now imagine what another attack would do ?

Answer 5

There were no planes and no hijackers - see below.
It was a missile that hit the pentagon.
No plane, therefore no engines.
Thermite was used in the controlled demolition.
The perpetrators knew before hand and wanted to make money on the stock exchange.
Evidence sols as part of the cover-up.
No planes, no passengers, no cell phones.
William Rodriguez offered money as part of cover-up
Towers fell at speed of gravity because all controlled demolitions fall that way.
The firefighters saw reality
Larry Silverstein made a mistake.

Manufactured terrorism
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html

No-planes important
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/matters.html

Answer 6

People dont like to actually look at the little details of things. There is more to 9/11 than what people want to think and that the gov. wants you to know.

Answer 7

sounds like you cracked the code or something.
i've heard and read everything you've posted at one time or another.
problem is, none of these so-called 9 hijackers have come forward to say, 'hey i'm still here'.
and only the fringe lunatics are the only ones claiming fraud.

Answer 8

And why do people still think it was Bin Laden?

Answer 9

http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-6708190071483512003&hl=en">
William Rodrigez speaks
WATCH, LEARN THE TRUTH
AND YOU A_MAN_ COULD_ STAND SHUT THE F*U*C*K* UP!!!!!!!!!! You are the one who is fooled

Answer 10

Check this link for many of your answers...