Why do Americans still think we attacked Iraq becuase of 9/11?

Question

I still see answers that say that Iraq is a just war becuase they attcked us first, on 9/11. Can anyone enlighten us?

Answer 1

from the answers you got, i see there is still a lot of misinformation out there, and some diehard republicans who still believe bush's lies. Most people didnt believe they were much of a threat in the first place, and everyone should know by now that we attacked them for the oil. We wanted to get a foothold in that area, and also be able to flood the market with cheap oil whenever we wanted to in order to break OPEC and ensure that the price of oil stays low for as long as possible.

Answer 2

Are you going to take the simplistic view that it was about oil? Yes, energy is important for the 1st worlds economy. Energy enables our life style. It both makes us more efficient and most of our toys require energy to be consumed.

It has taken about 100 years to consume about 1/2 the fossil fuels on this planet. Even though our toys are more efficient, more toys are being consumed. There are more people going to the well now that it is only 1/2 full. Bottom line it will be significantly less time to consume the 2nd half. Even if we captured ALL the oil in the middle east, we'd have to share or we couldn't sell our products.

The answer is to find some way to change the economics of renewable energy. As long as the philosophy that it has to be able to compete directly with the energy that created it, Renewables will lose! We haven't acknowledged that the "waste products of our fossil fuel subsidizes the cost of fuel. Some of those waste products goes into making clothes, plastics, & many other synthetics.

As long as one thinks small as our politians & environmentalists do there aren't any SELLABLE SPIN-OFF BENEFITS from Renewables. One has to look at the size of the problem to solve it.

Answer 3

Yes, Iraq was not attacked as revenge for 9/11, but was meant to provide an example to other middle eastern countries. We were supposed to create a democracy in a region where there are none. Additionally, it was to serve as a demonstration of American might and warn the world to stay on our side in the terror war.

Granted, we failed these objectives.

But any dictator such as Saddam is not a legitimate representative of his people and therefore fair game for regime change. We just need to execute (no pun intended) better next time.

Answer 4

We went into Iraq to have a strategic military foothold in the Middle East, and since we are at peak oil production, to secure the oil reserves that our corporations have billions of dollars invested interest.
And also we want 'friends' in the Middle East-- those who will cooperate with money for oil with the hopes it does not go to Islamic militants.

Let's stop funding terrorism, Renewable energy is now. Vote for third party.

Answer 5

yea, it was because of weapons of mass destruction which were later, never found. The top leaders have stated that Saddam and iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Answer 6

It seems that many Americans have lost the faculty of critical thinking.
Mind you, Im not surprised with all the mind control they have to put up with.
It seems that the CIA program has been extremely successful.


"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting, 1981)

For details on mind control, see below

Answer 7

the government would not could desire to secret agent on individuals. 3 articles under, on what Congress purely did in passing the invoice permitting spying on individuals, on what appalling undesirable theory it replaced into, and then a choose's opinion on why it is so incorrect. they are so articulate, i will enable them to communicate for themselves. The call of the long island situations article is: "The Wiretapping invoice: President Bush, and worry, Lead the Senate Off a Cliff." attractive, and depressing, reading. in my view, George Bush is bereft of genuine suggestions to combat terrorism. purely one occasion: he fired Richard Clarke, our counterterrorism expert, who were attempting to cajole Bush of the seriousness of the probability, yet Bush wasn't listening. GWB concept the Clinton administration were too aggravating approximately Al-Quaeda. And what a cost we paid on 9/11 - and proceed to pay on a daily basis. final yet no longer least: a hyperlink to Richard Clarke's e book against All Enemies, which relates how GWB has been delicate on terrorism -- disregarded it thoroughly -- and did no longer do what his specialists cautioned to evade an attack inclusive of 9/11. thank you on your impressive question!

Answer 8

For the same reason they re-elected the same person who proported that information in the first place.

Answer 9

WTF! Where did you get this fabricated sh** from! Bush did not order troops to invade Iraq because of 9/11! We went to war with them because they were a threat especially to us and to the rest of the world with Sad. Hus. in power and with their plans for the future. The men and women overseas did not risk their lives for no reason you stupid f***! Can't you support our country and the rest of the world on the war against terrorism!
I am an American and I am proud.
United we Stand!* (plus england and the rest of the countries in the world who support the united states in trying to help make the world a safe place.)

ALSO!!! DUH! EVERYONE KNOWS AFGHANISTAN ATTACKED THE US ON SEPT 11! NOT IRAQ!

Answer 10

Because a ton of people are just plain STUPID. But mostly this point is brought up by liberals as a paper tiger. They are STUPID too.