2006-09-22 13:26:04 · 14 answers · asked by thedeliciousone14 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I never thought about it that way but now that you mention it you're probably right..............that dawm bastard!!!!!
2006-09-22 13:33:34 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ Arvizu16 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not being a Bush fan, it would be logical to say that.
In reality, several factors came together and resulted in more oil available than was anticipated.
No severe huricanes in the Gulf Coast region so far.
The pipeline problem with BP is under control.
Economy slowing down, less use of gasoline.
The Lebanon/Israel conflict is over.
Tensions with North Korea and Iran somewhat subsiding.
All these factors contribute to the price of oil products trending lower.
For how long this lasts, nobody can say for sure.
2006-09-22 20:31:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does seem like that. The Bush family is well connected when it comes to oil. This may be payback to the Saudi family for not capturing their favorite son Osama Bin Laden. Our pursuit of the mastermind of 911 has been curiously restrained. President Bush is on record as saying he was not overly concerned with the whereabouts of Osama. Obviously, there is a connection with the Saudi royal house and the Bush family. There may be other promises our president has made as quid pro quo for lowering oil prices before an election.
2006-09-22 20:43:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Likely, remember that the price went up because he created all the tensions in the world and that the commodities market is in NYC and Chicago
2006-09-22 20:33:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. it's easier for Big Oil to keep the encumbants in office. They are already trained seals, eagerly waiting for their fish. But don't worry, the Dems are pretty good at snagging mackerel too.
2006-09-22 20:32:13 · answer #5 · answered by Elwood Blues 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
maybe but they might not just cause of the nov elections
2006-09-22 20:31:08 · answer #6 · answered by niesa 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not because he has no right to be three times president
2006-09-22 20:38:22 · answer #7 · answered by Promise of the Storm 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't be the least bit surprised
2006-09-22 20:33:24 · answer #8 · answered by niwriffej 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's possible
2006-09-22 20:27:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep
2006-09-22 20:34:25 · answer #10 · answered by jackie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋