These presidents would have put a cap in his ***.
Bush isn't a warmonger, he's a pansy.
Dems are even more pansy.
Not even the Repubs have enough balls to deal with these leaders that hate us and call for war.
2006-09-22 13:17:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I do educate myself, do you educate yourself?
doesn't take too long for someone to realize some leader from another country is on our soil insulting us.
it's called national pride
2006-09-22 13:25:01 · update #1
Mentioned Eisenhowever, but of course Ronald Reagan too.
and how am I 'too young to know history' when I'm referring to a president 20+ years behind Ronald Reagan..
better yet, shut your trap
2006-09-22 13:30:17 · update #2
he was quoting american imperialism and anti-american stuff too, and NO one insults our president, if our president's evil which he isn't it is our president not yours. Insult our president in your own country not on our soil.
2006-09-22 13:41:29 · update #3
We do need politicians like Reagan who has the guts to stand up to people like this and let them no they will not take it lying down. It irritates me to no end and I wish I could have 1 minute with that maniac and his anti American crap. Bo I don't believe either would have tolerated it.
2006-09-22 17:53:36 · answer #1 · answered by toughguy2 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
While Chavez was distasteful and crude in his comments, something unbecoming for the leader of any country, he is voicing a lot of what most outsiders feel deep down inside. This is the way I see it...Bush has been projecting hate from the moment he got into office. It was only a matter of time that the hatred would be catapulted right back to him. It is a pity that American citizens have to pay the price for this. You must take heed, because this is what the international community feels about Bush and his actions in the world today. As an aggressive nation, you cannot bully other nations and not expect some sort of revolt.
2006-09-22 20:34:09 · answer #2 · answered by Optimistic 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There would be no need to. Previous presidents haven't been quite as bad, or quite as stupid.
It's national pride which is blinding you to the truth. You have scales in front of your eyes which prevent you from educating yourself on anything which might criticize America.
Do you really think your country is perfect, with more people incarcerated than any other country, more debt than any other country, and creating more pollution than any other country.
Watch the interview below, and start to educate yourself in some truth, instead of swallowing propaganda hook, line, and sinker.
And then listen to the two tapes, of a completely non-political nature, which will set you on a track to enlightenment.
2006-09-22 23:29:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If he had, he would have recieved no applause, only boos. Don't underestimate Bush. He's try to sell anything his bosses want him to sell. That's why he selling war. And Chavez wasn't spewing anti-American stuff. It was all anti-Bush stuff. There's a BIG difference. Mosty of the stuff you are being told about Chavez is not true. Repubs have plenty of balls. That's why we have become a fascist nation. Dems have none! Zero! Nada! And you guys out there are like mice in a sociological experiment. Think you have any power? Fgetaboutit!!!! See the cheese? Get the cheese! Good little Americaner. Javold!!
2006-09-22 20:34:27 · answer #4 · answered by phoxee2003 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nor would they allow President Bush to go to
Venezuela and on tv call Chavez Hitler, evil,
destroyer of the world, etc. He would probably
be decapitated on the spot. But then, Mr. Bush
is a gentleman and would never do that anyway
to anyone. Heads of States should not be doing
things to cause more of a divide, they should be
trying to do and say things to unite us all.
2006-09-22 20:33:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, you're wrong. Bay of Pigs for example in reference to JFK.
I wouldn't refer to Bush as either a warmonger or a pansy, he's simply limited the same way other Presidents have been. I think Chavez should remember who butters his bread.
2006-09-22 20:25:52 · answer #6 · answered by EW 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ronald Reagan does that name ring a bell to you???
Since obvisouly you are far to young to understand anything in world history, look him up, read and expand your mind.
2006-09-22 20:27:29 · answer #7 · answered by John 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go educate yourself, step outside the box, take an overview.
Justice for all should mean "justice for all" on a global scale.
2006-09-22 20:23:46 · answer #8 · answered by How e' ye Horse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Glad I was not president, he would have been taken into custody and off to one of those secret prisons that don't exist any longer
2006-09-22 20:19:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That guy is just an annoyance , jfk and Eisenhower would of just ignored him and go on with their lives.
2006-09-22 20:34:09 · answer #10 · answered by Mr.happy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋