Did you know that the Civil war wasn't about ***** slaves? Please let me here your opinion.?

Question

Yes the war was about taxes and economics. And btw, Linclon had more slaves than all of the South generals put together.

Answer 1

Look at the historical fact that eastern Tennessee and western North Carolina (the area around Great Smoky Mountain Nat'l Park) tried to secede from those two respective states so that they could remain loyal to the Union. And that region, dotted with mountains, didn't have slaves. That region, like the rest of the south Appalachian region, was too hilly for plantation farming, so there weren't any slaves. The Republican Party voting habits of that region date all of the way back to the Civil War era -- because those voters didn't want to secede from the Union. I firmly believe that slavery was the ONLY reason for the South to secede.

Answer 2

The Civil War was officially about the separation of Federal and State Powers. However, the largest issue by far was slavery. With the victory by the Union, the Federal government quickly enforced its will by illegalizing several issue the mostly southern states were fighting for. Not many people realize Wisconsin was also a slave state.

Answer 3

While there were certainly economic factors and state's rights issues that contributed to the outbreak of theCivil War, it would be complete idiocy to ignore the role of the Abolitionist/Slavepig conflict in all of this.
Most of the "not about slavery" argument comes from the southern states, which, sorry to say, are still very backwards. In my lifetime (and I'm not THAT old) Jim Crow laws kept blacks and whites apart, black voters were largely disenfranchised, and black and white voter registration workers were beaten or killed. Sothern ignorance is still common today. These are mostly red states, full of NASCAR loving, gun toting miscreants listening to dumbass country western songs. Many of them still want to fly the Stars 'n' Bars, claiming that it represents "Southern heritage" not racism, despite the fact that it is clearly offensive to the vast majority of thinking people. That is like a German flying a Nazi flag and claiming that it holds "historical importance" and is not an oppresive symbol. Look, the south got its collective butt kicked in the Civil War. Stop flying that stupid flag and looking for reasons other than slavery for the war that tanned your hides.

Answer 4

The Civil War started because the North was sh*tting all over the South. High prices and tariffs kept most Southerners from buying goods from the industrial North especially when Northern factories paid squat for Southern agricultural goods. Slavery did not cause the war.

Answer 5

that's form of a loaded question. lots of the others answerers are superb. The undesirable Southern farmer that had no slaves in any respect have been nearly all of the accomplice military. They have been struggling with for state rights against Northern money hobbies and an unseen government. The Northern Abolitionists have been super! yet few in type. AND .... very almost all of them have been pacifists and would not combat in a conflict. lots of the non secular communities that have been time-honored anti-slavery like the Quakers, Amish, Mennonites, and Dunkards went to this point as packing up their bags and shifting west faraway from the struggling with. it extremely is the reason you will see Underground Railroad spots interior the northern area of Indiana .... far, far faraway from the conflict, finished of Quakers, Amish, Mennonites, and Dunkards. yet there have been whites that did no longer have self belief in slavery interior the North AND the South .... whites that fought interior the conflict too. yet to help my Marine brother above, i grew to become into military, and as quickly as a soldier gets into struggling with ..... they do no longer supply a damn approximately slaves, states rights, or something yet staying alive and attempting to maintain your comrades beside you alive. you will see atrocities, lots of them of all varieties, yet .... you in user-friendly terms ought to document that image away with the the remainder of photos you have on your strategies of alternative atrocities. you're able to be able to desire to bear in strategies all the foreign places squaddies conscripted good of the boats from England, eire, Scotland, etc. who did no longer even understand something approximately slaves. (and do not forget approximately the black freemen or run away slaves that somewhat DID combat for the slaves.) Did whites interior the civil conflict extremely care approximately liberating slaves? confident. however the record from maximum mandatory to least importnat often went from no longer getting shot, no longer ravenous to loss of existence, no longer traumatic to loss of existence that your loved ones is advantageous back homestead, that your spouse hasn't been raped and killed with the aid of enemy forces, that each thing you have wasn't been burned to the floor .... and, oh yeah, the slaves.

Answer 6

NO, IT WAS ABOUT 2 SIDES THAT HAD DIFFERENT OPINIONS ON HOW THE COUNTRY SHOULD BE RAN!! THE SLAVES MIGHT HAVE BEEN AN ISSUE, BUT IT WASN'T THE ONLY ISSUE!!!

Answer 7

it didn't seem to start out over that... but it seemed to kind of end up being part of what the war was over...

kind of like how terror had nothing to do with Iraq when we went into Iraq, but now it's the reason that we are still there apparently...

Answer 8

yes and i also know lincoln did not free the slaves because he was not president of the states he supposedly freed them in.

Answer 9

It was lepigasshole boi. Lepig freed all the Jews at the same time.

Answer 10

It was started because someone put Mayo on someones sandwich who was lactose intolarant