that a female singer should not be considered a diva unless she has done her time.....??? Diana Ross, Whitney Houston etc, they are true divas, and in no way is Christina Aguilara a Diva and she's not talented enough to ever be one in my opinion...i think it is rude to use that term and somewhat of a slam towards the talented women who have earned that title through years of hard work!! does anyone agree w/ me??
2006-09-22 10:36:46 · 11 answers · asked by *walkinthelight* 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
i agree and none of the female singers out today hold a candle to those back in the day, diana ross, aretha franklin, tina turner donna summers and even cher they r talent these others in my opinion cant sing they r only on stage as sex kittens to dance and there voices r electronically digitally enhanced. mariah carey has more talent than christina or any one out 2day, she has a voice as does celine dion and leann rhymes
2006-09-22 10:49:27 · answer #1 · answered by smiley283 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. Diana Ross, Aretha Franklin, et al are divas not only because of their talent and hard work, but because their music has stood the test of time. Forty years from now, will we still be listening to Christina's music? Probably not.
2006-09-22 10:56:04 · answer #2 · answered by badseamstress 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree. The word was used Very loosely back in the late 90s/early 00s & was thrown at just about any female singer who did the vocal acrobatics thing. (which, IMO, is Totally played out & cliche now)
2006-09-22 10:39:03 · answer #3 · answered by Fonzie T 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i think christina aguilara is very talented and shes been singing since she was very little i seen this thing on t.v about christina aguilara and they showed a lot about her life and she had been singing and winning contests since she was little so im not sure if i agree with u or if i disagree with u
2006-09-22 10:47:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutely right! I don't like it either when someone is called a diva after releasing 1 or 2 albums, I wouldn't even call them "stars" then, only "celebrities".
2006-09-25 00:23:13 · answer #5 · answered by Annie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, its disrespectful to say or compare the truly divas, and the wannabes. They have to really earn it to be called divas
2006-09-22 10:49:33 · answer #6 · answered by Charlie 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most definitely I agree with you it's disrespectful & makes all those great singers seem like they achieved nothing by working so hard to get where they are at.!!
2006-09-22 10:39:27 · answer #7 · answered by simple one 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I definately agree
2006-09-22 10:44:01 · answer #8 · answered by parrothead2371 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It relies upon, how somebody or you seem at your self or others. i think of fat is greater suitable than BMI, I thiknk fat may well be once you weigh greater suitable than 20 greater suitable than the vaerage weight for that height. skinny? i might say 10 below somebody ought to weigh is skinny. Sorry, i wish i did no longer confuse you too lots.
2016-10-15 07:39:10 · answer #9 · answered by benavidez 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree.
2006-09-22 10:38:04 · answer #10 · answered by IthinkFramptonisstillahottie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋