English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-22 09:28:57 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Both towers came down, plus WTC7 was dropped via demolitions. At the Pentagon, a 65-foot wide section of wall in the outer ring (the E Ring) collapsed after sufficient fire damage destroyed the supports not blown out by the explosion.

What is significant here for a thinking person is to ask yourself some serious questions about the nature of the damage. We saw video footage of the aircraft that struck the towers, so we know they were hit. But the only thing that hit Building 7 was a few random bits of debris. Early photos show very minimal damage to the building from the debris, with a few tiny fires burning that could probably be dealt with by the sprinkler system. Yet the owner stated in an interview that the building was determined to be so badly damaged that "the decision was made to pull it (the building), so we pulled it". "Pulling" a building is a demolitions term. Pulling a building of that size involves bringing in a team of engineers and demolitions experts to do a structural analysis and precision rigging and synchronization of the charges. It's something that takes weeks of planning to implement, and you certainly don't do it in a structurally compromised burning building in a few hours. I worked with demolitions in the military, and even if the analysis had already been done "once upon a time", you can't rig it that fast. Yet what did we see on tv? A contolled drop of WTC7, via explosives, just hours after the towers were hit.

Firefighters who were in the towers reported hearing explosives going off prior to it falling. Consider this, too: remember the angle of the second tower impact? It was angular, across a corner. Now, forgetting the fact that the steel was rated for 2700 degrees (MUCH higher than the burn temperature of the Jet-A that was in the plane) or that the building was designed to withstand a strike from a jet, assume that the impact and fuel DID weaken the building on that corner enough to cause a collapse. Using common sense, do you think the building would drop straight down like what you get in a controlled demolitions drop, or would the damaged corner sag while the undamaged side resisted, causing a slow leaning of the top of the building until the undamaged side eventually gave way and sent the top part of the building off like a falling tree?

At the Pentagon, you see a 65 foot wide section of damage. But the wing span of a Boeing 757 is 124' 10". Don't you think the wings of a 757 traveling 400 mph would at least scratch the outer wall where it hit, or knock out a few windows? The plane seems to have disappeared into a 16' hole, from the available photos of the wall prior to its collapse from the fire damage. Even the 43' tail failed to leave a mark above the hole. Does anyone who has seen the evidence really believe the story we were told? It is cowardly for an American to hide from the truth of what happened on 9/11 because they just don't want to deal with it. Those who say "Oh, that's just more conspiracy craziness" are cowards, and do not deserve to live under our flag. Those who died on that day, and those who knew and loved them, deserve more from their countrymen than snivelly comments from cowards.

If this is new to you, seek out the truth. It's going to happen again, and they'll be blaming terrorists for it. We need to clean up our domestic terrorists. Learn the truth.

www.scholarsfor911truth.org
www.thepowerhour.com

There are a lot more sites with awesome evidence. Run a search... you'll find them.

2006-09-22 10:06:18 · answer #1 · answered by newhebrew1964 3 · 0 1

3

2006-09-22 09:45:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Two towers, and one building. Tower 2 collapsed to the ground at 9:59 am and Tower 1 followed at 10:28 am. World Trade Center Building 7 collapsed at 5:20 pm, with no casualties. In all, 2,595 people inside and near the towers were killed, along with the 157 people who were aboard the flights.

2006-09-22 09:47:01 · answer #3 · answered by navymom 5 · 0 1

the twin towers and building 7 due to the damage it received from the debris of the two towers.

2006-09-22 09:34:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The twin towers and another one. total three, mind you the last tower looked like planned detonations!

2006-09-22 09:32:30 · answer #5 · answered by Abularaby 4 · 0 1

3. The twin towers and the smaller one in the same complex.

2006-09-22 09:30:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

i am pretty sure just the twin towers so 2

2006-09-22 09:32:09 · answer #7 · answered by lovecomingout2u 2 · 0 1

i grew to become into in fourth grade and no one advised us what grew to become into happening, mothers and fathers in simple terms stored taking their youngsters out of sophistication. Later my grandma picked me up and advised me what passed off and how the faculty would not enable her take me until eventually now. Being that i grew to become into 9 on the time, i did no longer understand the severity. Then I walked into my cousin's homestead and the 1st element I observed grew to become into the playback of the planes colliding on a super exhibit screen television. I lived in ny on the time and my mom mom might grab my brother and that i and make us stay interior the basement each time we heard planes overhead. I bear in strategies the 1st time my canines grew to become into left upstairs and that i grew to become into sobbing because of the fact i presumed she might die. below a month later my college carried out that's first (and final) disaster drill because of the fact the 60s. They dragged us into the hallway and made us take a seat with our heads against the wall would not let us know what grew to become into happening so anybody thought we've been being attacked back. numerous mothers and fathers extremely had to sue the faculty after that.

2016-10-15 07:35:25 · answer #8 · answered by graviett 4 · 0 0

The twin towers and WTC7 - so three total

2006-09-22 09:32:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

sadly 2 and a building
poor souls
stupid terroists blow up somet else like ur own country

2006-09-22 09:31:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers