2006-09-22 08:56:46 · 16 answers · asked by Mr_Dream D 1 in Health ➔ Men's Health
If you lopped off part of your son's penis simply becasue of some asthetic prefence YOU have, you should be in prison.
There are so many other factors surrounding whether a man will be worthy of your love, that I find it utterly silly to even debate the sexual advantages of a particular anatomical feature. If you let that determine the success or failure of your relationships, you aare unbelievably shallow, and deserve the loneliness that awaits you.
2006-09-22 09:56:43 · answer #1 · answered by danisaacs 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Intact for sure ("uncircumcised" refers to a restored foreskin on a circumcised penis, just as my breasts are not "unmasectomised" merely because they are still intact). I like my men natural. It's just as clean as long as he takes a shower a few times a week and retracts and rinses. It's infinitely easier to clean an intact penis than to clean a vulva (and I should know about that!). Circumcised penises make me sad because they're so hard and dry and scarred. Not so pleasant to have inside oneself, I'm sure you can imagine.
All my friends who have been with both circumcised and intact men, FAR prefer the intact penis. Check out http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/ to SEE why the intact penis is better (there are black and white penis pictures to illustrate the point) and to read some of the book "Sex As Nature Intended" which is written from the point of view of a woman who's experienced both. There is also some evidence that male circumcision is a factor in female arousal syndrome, but that's a whole other answer there...
And circumcising a helpless baby who doesn't have any say in the matter is completely barbaric. If I chopped off my daughter's clitoral hood, I would be in jail, but people give their infant sons damaging cosmetic surgery without their son's consent every day and it's perfectly legal. Double standard, anyone? The reasons for FGM and MGM are almost identical and both are horrific things to do to someone else. If someone (male or female) wants to be circumcised later in life, then more power to them, but it shouldn't be done to someone without their consent!
2006-09-23 13:39:22 · answer #2 · answered by Betsy 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think there are a lot of other things that matter more--how the man treats you, the techniques he uses when making love, etc. That said, I have no problems with my un-circumcised partner. For one thing, people argue that an un-circumcised partner won't last as long. If my partner lasted any longer than he already does, I would probably have to be hospitalized! Secondly, the whole "it's cleaner" thing dates back to a time before modern soaps and shampoos. If a man showers once a day, I don't see how it would be such a problem.
2006-09-22 16:02:57 · answer #3 · answered by Kiki 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Some uncircumcised men have a cleanliness/odor issue. Maybe it's not lack of hygiene, it's just that the possibility of smells accumulating is higher. I have noticed a difference in smell, and I prefer circumcised.
Also, there is extra sensitivity, which can lead to higher incidence of 'hair trigger' or climaxing sooner than your partner would like. It's not a given that circumcised men don't have that problem, but it seems to happen with them a smaller percentage of the time.
I made sure that my son was circumcised to prevent any of these problems. And I've known kids of friends who've had bad, bad problems with foreskins, and had to be circumcised at 8 or 10, not nearly as easy a thing to deal with as it would've been in a newborn. I've heard urologists say that there are a bunch of problems that circumcised men never, ever show up with, but uncircumcised men do. So there may be some truth to the idea that it's healthier.
2006-09-22 16:10:21 · answer #4 · answered by ற¢ԲèişŦվ 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i'm taken by surprise by all the negative comments about having an uncut penis. i'm a 8", uncut guy, groomed to perfection, shaved, and extremely wide. when erect my buddy is over 10" long. while erect, i am cut. i have a mushroom head and once it's in your vagina you don't have to be disgusted by its look. you just need to enjoy the fun.
i'm not bragging, but i've been with at least 12-15 women. not a one have shown any disgust in my uncut c--k, nor its size, nor the way i can handle performance with it. i also come equipped with a busy, talented tongue.
i really am disappointed by the fact that the majority of your answers opposed uncut
d--ks.
2006-09-22 20:46:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
THIS CAN NOT BE A GENERALISED QUESTION. YOUR ORIGIN, ETHNIC GROUP AND/OR RELIGION WILL DETERMINE THIS. A WOMAN THAT COMES FROM AFRICAN ORIGIN WILL PREFER A CIRCUMCISED MEN BECAUSE SHE IS USED TO THESE KIND OF MEN ALL HER LIFE. THERE ARE EXCEPTIONAL CASES WHEN YOU GET INVOLVED WITH OTHER MEN THAT ARE NON-CIRCUMCISED, THIS MIGHT OR COULD CHANGE YOUR ORIENTATION. HOWEVER, MEN BEING CIRCUMCISED DOESN'T DETERMINE THEIR SEXUAL PROWESS NEITHER DOES IT INDICATE THEIR BEING A BETTER LOVER
2006-09-22 16:05:12 · answer #6 · answered by kemi B 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Intact is definitely better! The gliding motion is absent in a cut man - very disappointing. And having a scar where the foreskin should be is just sick looking! I feel very sorry for men who were mutilated as babies.
2006-09-23 22:18:32 · answer #7 · answered by Maple 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
listen dude if you are uncircumcised dont wory about it it is what god gave you, and for good reason. If you were to be circumsised now it will be the most painfull experience of your life trust me on this I know someone who had this done and he said never would he have done it if he knew the pain
2006-09-22 16:06:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Circumcised!
An non-circumcised man can be too sensitive and if he doesn't have good hygiene he can ...smell. Sorry, but it's true.
2006-09-22 16:02:29 · answer #9 · answered by TurntableKitty 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Circumcised only!
2006-09-22 16:18:21 · answer #10 · answered by ChaoticChicaLovesJT 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋