2006-09-22 08:45:42 · 2 answers · asked by TheBoy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Johnathan, Stop coming here and expecting people to do your homework for you. If you don't know the answer, look it up. I expect it's in your textbook. Maybe you should actually open it once in a while. ---Johnathan's Dad
2006-09-22 09:08:39 · answer #1 · answered by Chredon 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it has greater to do with ideology than who's in "means", yet your question is a valid one. That mentioned, one would think of a balanced domicile/senate would be greater conducive to effeciency, yet whilst we talk (with a digital tie interior the senate) there are people who desire to stall important law (i'm questioning of revisions to the sparkling Air Act), by potential of forcing the entire bill to be study aloud on the senate floor (and thank you mr mconnel, R-KY) for enjoying politics in this needed count). it looks the republicans are against any climate law provided that it hurts "human beings and jobs"--and that they fail to comprehend any destructive climate replace will influence all human beings, in spite of political association. So, in end, at the same time as i agree which incorporate your premise, i'm hoping there is an all democratic majority (domicile/senate/white domicile) so we are able to finally start to intelligently handle this undertaking. And confident, i'm a registered self sustaining.
2016-12-18 15:04:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋